Tools & Wizards About Us
checkers.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

checkers.com

Checkers Drive-In – Burgers - Fries - Cola - Wings

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

494 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

193 ms

checkers.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to checkers.com homepage info - get ready to check Checkers best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about checkers.com

Checkers was born out of the idea that boring and bland have no place in the burger world. That’s why we’ve been slinging the best burgers, crispiest fries, and the creamiest milkshakes for a price th...

Visit checkers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 494 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkers.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkers.com

494 ms

fonts.1456762309.css

140 ms

style.1456762309.css

545 ms

home.1456762309.css

215 ms

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Checkers.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 341.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Checkers.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 18.3 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 164.8 kB

  • Original 246.7 kB
  • After minification 237.5 kB
  • After compression 81.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 136.5 kB

  • Original 164.3 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 136.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (26%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

checkers.com

checkers.com

494 ms

fonts.1456762309.css

fonts.1456762309.css

140 ms

style.1456762309.css

style.1456762309.css

545 ms

home.1456762309.css

home.1456762309.css

215 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

6 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

5 ms

script.1456762309.js

script.1456762309.js

148 ms

CSSPlugin.min.js

CSSPlugin.min.js

287 ms

EasePack.min.js

EasePack.min.js

215 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

529 ms

TimelineMax.min.js

TimelineMax.min.js

289 ms

jQueryRotateCompressed.js

jQueryRotateCompressed.js

291 ms

home.js

home.js

434 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

home-bg.png

home-bg.png

84 ms

bg_checkers_maroon.png

bg_checkers_maroon.png

82 ms

logos.png

logos.png

296 ms

icons.png

icons.png

528 ms

bg_b.jpg

bg_b.jpg

378 ms

cta.png

cta.png

83 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

295 ms

cta.png

cta.png

143 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

371 ms

mrbag.png

mrbag.png

577 ms

cta.png

cta.png

368 ms

flavorhood_checkers.png

flavorhood_checkers.png

582 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

441 ms

nav-tile-menu.png

nav-tile-menu.png

441 ms

nav-menu.png

nav-menu.png

448 ms

nav-tile-locations.png

nav-tile-locations.png

511 ms

location-search-submit.png

location-search-submit.png

513 ms

location-not-found2.png

location-not-found2.png

520 ms

nav-tile-franchise.png

nav-tile-franchise.png

583 ms

nav-franchising.1398891102.png

nav-franchising.1398891102.png

584 ms

nav-tile-careers.png

nav-tile-careers.png

591 ms

nav-careers.png

nav-careers.png

596 ms

star.png

star.png

644 ms

beefup.png

beefup.png

651 ms

spam-nav.png

spam-nav.png

654 ms

nav-tiles-bg.png

nav-tiles-bg.png

638 ms

nav-tile-header-bg.png

nav-tile-header-bg.png

644 ms

nav-tile-bg.png

nav-tile-bg.png

649 ms

nav-tiles-bg-subscribe.png

nav-tiles-bg-subscribe.png

698 ms

league-gothic.woff

league-gothic.woff

705 ms

league-gothic-sm.woff

league-gothic-sm.woff

711 ms

slide-left.png

slide-left.png

656 ms

slide-right.png

slide-right.png

666 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

Accessibility Review

checkers.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

checkers.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

checkers.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkers.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Checkers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: