Tools & Wizards About Us
chicagowrap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

chicagowrap.com

Chicago Wrap - Car Wraps, Vehicle Graphics, Vinyl Wrap

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

887 ms

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

chicagowrap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chicago Wrap content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chicagowrap.com

Chicago Wrap is a vehicle graphics sign and banner company in Midwest specializing in design printing and installing, showcasing the top-notch products. Car wraps are not only good advertising and pro...

Visit chicagowrap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chicagowrap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chicagowrap.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chicagowrap.com

80 ms

rs=w:1920,m

520 ms

script.js

40 ms

UX.4.34.11.js

49 ms

script.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chicagowrap.com, 90% (18 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (775 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 950.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Chicagowrap.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 181.9 kB

  • Original 208.2 kB
  • After minification 208.2 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 181.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 726.0 kB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chicago Wrap needs image optimization as it can save up to 726.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 42.3 kB

  • Original 164.3 kB
  • After minification 164.3 kB
  • After compression 122.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chicago Wrap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chicagowrap.com

chicagowrap.com

80 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

520 ms

script.js

script.js

40 ms

UX.4.34.11.js

UX.4.34.11.js

49 ms

script.js

script.js

43 ms

js

js

86 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

299 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

775 ms

qt=q:95

qt=q:95

135 ms

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true,m

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true,m

54 ms

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true,m

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true,m

56 ms

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true,m

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true,m

188 ms

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true

rs=w:365,h:365,cg:true

218 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

359 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

5 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

3 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

16 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

17 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

17 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

18 ms

Accessibility Review

chicagowrap.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

chicagowrap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chicagowrap.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chicagowrap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chicagowrap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chicagowrap.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chicago Wrap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: