2.2 sec in total
273 ms
1.8 sec
157 ms
Welcome to chiff.com homepage info - get ready to check Chiff best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about chiff.com
The feel good guide to sports, shopping, travel & entertainment.
Visit chiff.comWe analyzed Chiff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
chiff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value3,390 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
273 ms
327 ms
4 ms
74 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Chiff.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (389 ms) belongs to the original domain Chiff.com.
Page size can be reduced by 846.0 kB (57%)
1.5 MB
633.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Chiff.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 994.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chiff needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 623.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 623.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chiff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (31%)
49
34
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chiff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
chiff.com
273 ms
www.chiff.com
327 ms
flexslider.css
4 ms
jquery.min.js
74 ms
jquery.cookiesdirective.js
106 ms
camera.css
165 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
138 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
303 ms
camera.min.js
265 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
chiffcom-head.jpg
11 ms
submit1-a.jpg
8 ms
pop-culture1a.jpg
8 ms
science1.jpg
58 ms
pop-culture2.jpg
8 ms
science2.jpg
9 ms
pop-culture3.jpg
10 ms
science3.jpg
9 ms
sports1.jpg
11 ms
politics2.jpg
12 ms
sports2.jpg
11 ms
politics1.jpg
59 ms
sports3.jpg
12 ms
politics3.jpg
57 ms
facebook1.jpg
59 ms
chiffcom-head2.jpg
57 ms
img.gif
57 ms
layers.3643cb2e25fb91c29386.js
12 ms
camera_skins.png
37 ms
300lo.json
54 ms
camera-loader.gif
47 ms
image267.jpg
371 ms
undefined
138 ms
ca-pub-1026346528490879.js
73 ms
zrt_lookup.html
125 ms
show_ads_impl.js
71 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
34 ms
ads
148 ms
osd.js
3 ms
pixel
16 ms
pixel
12 ms
css
63 ms
m_js_controller.js
31 ms
abg.js
37 ms
favicon
36 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
19 ms
s
19 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
33 ms
x_button_blue2.png
16 ms
image261.jpg
389 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
3 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
33 ms
chiff.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
chiff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chiff.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chiff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chiff.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
chiff.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chiff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: