741 ms in total
161 ms
465 ms
115 ms
Click here to check amazing Choice content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choice.net
CoreComm - Internet Service Provider offering Web Hosting and Internet Access starting at only $19.95/month.
Visit choice.netWe analyzed Choice.net page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 580 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
choice.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
161 ms
59 ms
20 ms
59 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Choice.net, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (221 ms) belongs to the original domain Choice.net.
Page size can be reduced by 50.9 kB (23%)
220.6 kB
169.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Choice.net main page is 220.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 151.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choice.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
choice.net
161 ms
newcore.css
59 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
cc07front.png
59 ms
button_glass_go_red.png
39 ms
google-pwr.png
60 ms
spacer.gif
61 ms
cc07girl.jpg
184 ms
cc07header.png
124 ms
cc07price.png
61 ms
cc07button.png
88 ms
bullet_tri_hollow_orange.png
88 ms
learnmore_green.png
127 ms
cc07bottom.png
221 ms
block-smartguard.png
149 ms
block-hosting-single.png
187 ms
block-247.png
151 ms
cc07background.png
161 ms
collect
28 ms
home-up.gif
31 ms
offers-up.gif
33 ms
about-up.gif
31 ms
products-up.gif
34 ms
support-up.gif
34 ms
account-up.gif
33 ms
choice.net accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
choice.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
choice.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choice.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Choice.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
choice.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: