Tools & Wizards About Us
choicecleaning.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    28% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 73% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

choicecleaning.co.uk

Office Cleaners Bristol | Office Cleaning | Choice Cleaning Company

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

264 ms

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

295 ms

choicecleaning.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to choicecleaning.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Choice Cleaning best content right away, or after learning these important things about choicecleaning.co.uk

Choice Cleaning Office Cleaners Bristol based, covering the whole BS Postcode area. The Very Best Office Cleaning Bristol Has To Offer.

Visit choicecleaning.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicecleaning.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choicecleaning.co.uk performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,810 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choicecleaning.co.uk

264 ms

www.choicecleaning.co.uk

1111 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

114 ms

style.min.css

234 ms

css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Choicecleaning.co.uk, 5% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Choicecleaning.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

297.9 kB

After Optimization

287.8 kB

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choicecleaning.co.uk main page is 297.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 238.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 238.3 kB
  • After minification 231.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice Cleaning images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB
  • After compression 52.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choicecleaning.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (84%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Cleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choicecleaning.co.uk

choicecleaning.co.uk

264 ms

www.choicecleaning.co.uk

www.choicecleaning.co.uk

1111 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

114 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

234 ms

css

css

56 ms

menu-animation.min.css

menu-animation.min.css

316 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

320 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

316 ms

blog-layout-1.min.css

blog-layout-1.min.css

325 ms

astra-hooks-sticky-header-footer.min.css

astra-hooks-sticky-header-footer.min.css

327 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

338 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

424 ms

layout-3.min.css

layout-3.min.css

423 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

463 ms

below-header-style.min.css

below-header-style.min.css

469 ms

below-header-layout-2.min.css

below-header-layout-2.min.css

433 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

462 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

529 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

530 ms

mega-menu.min.css

mega-menu.min.css

538 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

565 ms

style.css

style.css

559 ms

all.css

all.css

202 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

258 ms

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

570 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

643 ms

css

css

40 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

1266 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

140 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

759 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

660 ms

jq-sticky-anything.min.js

jq-sticky-anything.min.js

662 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

683 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

750 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

781 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

791 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

804 ms

jquery.modal.min.css

jquery.modal.min.css

857 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

4040 ms

stickThis.js

stickThis.js

889 ms

advanced-hooks-sticky-header-footer.min.js

advanced-hooks-sticky-header-footer.min.js

897 ms

ast-below-header.min.js

ast-below-header.min.js

916 ms

sticky-header.min.js

sticky-header.min.js

968 ms

scroll-to-top.min.js

scroll-to-top.min.js

910 ms

mega-menu-frontend.min.js

mega-menu-frontend.min.js

792 ms

advanced-search.min.js

advanced-search.min.js

735 ms

jquery.modal.min.js

jquery.modal.min.js

784 ms

moatframe.js

moatframe.js

78 ms

choice-cleaning-logo-new.png

choice-cleaning-logo-new.png

163 ms

office-cleaning.jpg

office-cleaning.jpg

448 ms

window-cleaning.jpg

window-cleaning.jpg

475 ms

cleaning-supplies.jpg

cleaning-supplies.jpg

443 ms

cleaners-bristol-570x381.jpg

cleaners-bristol-570x381.jpg

245 ms

35years.png

35years.png

275 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

25 ms

layers.fa6cd1947ce26e890d3d.js

layers.fa6cd1947ce26e890d3d.js

28 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

222 ms

sh.f48a1a04fe8dbf021b4cda1d.html

sh.f48a1a04fe8dbf021b4cda1d.html

34 ms

Accessibility Review

choicecleaning.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

choicecleaning.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

choicecleaning.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicecleaning.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Choicecleaning.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

choicecleaning.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice Cleaning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: