Tools & Wizards About Us
choicefulfilment.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

choicefulfilment.com

UK's Leading Order Fulfilment Company for Small Businesses, UK

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

choicefulfilment.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to choicefulfilment.com homepage info - get ready to check Choice Fulfilment best content right away, or after learning these important things about choicefulfilment.com

Trusted Order Fulfilment for Small Business UK, Order Fulfilment Services, Fulfilment Warehouse with no setup fees or minimum orders.

Visit choicefulfilment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicefulfilment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choicefulfilment.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,360 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.151

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choicefulfilment.com

2276 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

171 ms

cli-style.css

188 ms

style_for_map.css

199 ms

calendar-jos.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Choicefulfilment.com, 22% (10 requests) were made to Choicefulfilment.com.gridhosted.co.uk and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Choicefulfilment.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (79%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

337.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choicefulfilment.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 901.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 36.1 kB
  • After minification 34.0 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 80.1 kB

  • Original 183.8 kB
  • After minification 103.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Choice Fulfilment needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 732.5 kB

  • Original 901.8 kB
  • After minification 671.9 kB
  • After compression 169.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 732.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 410.3 kB

  • Original 466.2 kB
  • After minification 413.9 kB
  • After compression 56.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choicefulfilment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 410.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Fulfilment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choicefulfilment.com

choicefulfilment.com

2276 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

171 ms

cli-style.css

cli-style.css

188 ms

style_for_map.css

style_for_map.css

199 ms

calendar-jos.css

calendar-jos.css

187 ms

jquery-ui-spinner.css

jquery-ui-spinner.css

280 ms

css.css

css.css

223 ms

wp_shopping_cart_style.css

wp_shopping_cart_style.css

348 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

403 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

1005 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

450 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

402 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

695 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

513 ms

cookielawinfo.js

cookielawinfo.js

580 ms

main_front_end.js

main_front_end.js

765 ms

js

js

22 ms

if_gmap_front_end.js

if_gmap_front_end.js

626 ms

calendar.js

calendar.js

785 ms

calendar-setup.js

calendar-setup.js

749 ms

calendar_function.js

calendar_function.js

818 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

1600 ms

jquery.ui.slider.js

jquery.ui.slider.js

1120 ms

js.min.js

js.min.js

925 ms

3c2841787d85fbe3c00cde25f3554565ebbe136c.js

3c2841787d85fbe3c00cde25f3554565ebbe136c.js

963 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1083 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1084 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

1289 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1459 ms

cf-logo.png

cf-logo.png

266 ms

RoyalMail.jpg

RoyalMail.jpg

326 ms

IMAG0778-750489_330x220.jpg

IMAG0778-750489_330x220.jpg

341 ms

tags.png

tags.png

529 ms

click_deliver-15721_330x220.jpg

click_deliver-15721_330x220.jpg

263 ms

letter.png

letter.png

263 ms

storage.png

storage.png

414 ms

circle_blue_orders.png

circle_blue_orders.png

444 ms

gray.png

gray.png

444 ms

yellow.png

yellow.png

499 ms

1-2hKopnVCDFmn0scYxOiA.woff

1-2hKopnVCDFmn0scYxOiA.woff

107 ms

hlJvr4GP74xaPxO7yOXXnQ.woff

hlJvr4GP74xaPxO7yOXXnQ.woff

107 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

471 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

184 ms

Accessibility Review

choicefulfilment.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

choicefulfilment.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

choicefulfilment.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicefulfilment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choicefulfilment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choicefulfilment.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choice Fulfilment. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: