Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

733 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

chrisbarber.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chrisbarber.net homepage info - get ready to check Chrisbarber best content right away, or after learning these important things about chrisbarber.net

Official website for Chris Barber / The BIG Chris Barber Band

Visit chrisbarber.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Chrisbarber.net page load time and found that the first response time was 733 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chrisbarber.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chrisbarber.net

733 ms

new-2008-9pt-line13-blue.css

188 ms

google_custom_search_smnar.gif

35 ms

chrisbarbernet

355 ms

logo-2013-2.jpg

645 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Chrisbarber.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Counter.digits.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Chrisbarber.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Chrisbarber.net main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 75.2 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 158.5 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chrisbarber images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 916 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 973 B
  • After compression 287 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chrisbarber.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 916 B or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chrisbarber. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

chrisbarber.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

chrisbarber.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

chrisbarber.net SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chrisbarber.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Chrisbarber.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chrisbarber. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: