Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

christianbrandt.org

Reviews y Articulos Sobre Suplementos de Salud

Page Load Speed

18.5 sec in total

First Response

459 ms

Resources Loaded

15.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.7 sec

christianbrandt.org screenshot

About Website

Visit christianbrandt.org now to see the best up-to-date Christianbrandt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about christianbrandt.org

Visit christianbrandt.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Christianbrandt.org page load time and found that the first response time was 459 ms and then it took 18.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

christianbrandt.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

christianbrandt.org

459 ms

style.css

156 ms

jquery.js

209 ms

cookie.js

207 ms

1_christian-brandt.jpg

14699 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Christianbrandt.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Christianbrandt.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.4 kB (52%)

Content Size

25.5 kB

After Optimization

12.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Christianbrandt.org main page is 25.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 22.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 704 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 280 B, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 744 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 705 B
  • After compression 346 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Christianbrandt.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 744 B or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Christianbrandt. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

christianbrandt.org accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

christianbrandt.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

christianbrandt.org SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Christianbrandt.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Christianbrandt.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Christianbrandt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: