Tools & Wizards About Us
chuggington.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

chuggington.com

Chuggington | Chuggington

Page Load Speed

16 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

8.6 sec

chuggington.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chuggington content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chuggington.com

Welcome to Chuggington's official website! Watch episodes, meet your favourite characters, play games, or have some family fun with our activities.

Visit chuggington.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chuggington.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 14.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chuggington.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chuggington.com

1103 ms

chuggington.com

808 ms

a88fa9e2709ed81eaab3c6b65e6a493e.js

165 ms

d730f3e8059b01aaaf8cc298a1de4c21.css

557 ms

39d16b74b09bc0f337529b25c1eda3ab.css

1543 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Chuggington.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Chuggington.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 363.0 kB (36%)

Content Size

998.5 kB

After Optimization

635.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chuggington.com main page is 998.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 538.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 538.0 kB
  • After minification 524.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chuggington images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 123.1 kB

  • Original 199.1 kB
  • After minification 198.8 kB
  • After compression 76.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.1 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 222.8 kB

  • Original 256.7 kB
  • After minification 254.3 kB
  • After compression 33.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chuggington.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 222.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (33%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chuggington. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chuggington.com

chuggington.com

1103 ms

chuggington.com

chuggington.com

808 ms

a88fa9e2709ed81eaab3c6b65e6a493e.js

a88fa9e2709ed81eaab3c6b65e6a493e.js

165 ms

d730f3e8059b01aaaf8cc298a1de4c21.css

d730f3e8059b01aaaf8cc298a1de4c21.css

557 ms

39d16b74b09bc0f337529b25c1eda3ab.css

39d16b74b09bc0f337529b25c1eda3ab.css

1543 ms

9f93e6a3fa8b0cf7d981de263d99ba71.js

9f93e6a3fa8b0cf7d981de263d99ba71.js

1637 ms

cffe24f533db0c1425871640cf45869a.js

cffe24f533db0c1425871640cf45869a.js

1674 ms

d52e8551bff7d70411e743d770373b7f.js

d52e8551bff7d70411e743d770373b7f.js

1744 ms

619d39d41ef8e780025d2aadaccb1154.js

619d39d41ef8e780025d2aadaccb1154.js

1744 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

949 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

845 ms

city.png

city.png

2578 ms

logo.png

logo.png

843 ms

kids_img.png

kids_img.png

843 ms

gu_img.png

gu_img.png

2592 ms

SirSpicious.woff

SirSpicious.woff

1734 ms

InterstateBold.woff

InterstateBold.woff

1790 ms

collect

collect

162 ms

exit.png

exit.png

162 ms

HelveticaNeueLight.woff

HelveticaNeueLight.woff

239 ms

Accessibility Review

chuggington.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chuggington.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

chuggington.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chuggington.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chuggington.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chuggington.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chuggington. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: