2 sec in total
506 ms
1.3 sec
220 ms
Visit cidepix.com now to see the best up-to-date Cidepix content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cidepix.com
Visit cidepix.comWe analyzed Cidepix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 506 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
cidepix.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value4.2 s
86/100
10%
506 ms
74 ms
9 ms
8 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Cidepix.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (506 ms) belongs to the original domain Cidepix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 603.9 kB (46%)
1.3 MB
701.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Cidepix.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 588.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cidepix needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 326.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cidepix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)
59
35
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cidepix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cidepix.com
506 ms
css
74 ms
frontend.css
9 ms
style.css
8 ms
styles.css
6 ms
jquery.js
47 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
9 ms
bootstrap.min.js
10 ms
modernizr.js
74 ms
scripts.js
73 ms
scripts.js
13 ms
api.js
77 ms
flexslider.css
53 ms
public.css
53 ms
small-menu.js
53 ms
wp-embed.min.js
53 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
54 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
11 ms
style.css
11 ms
bootstrap.css
15 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
13 ms
font-awesome.css
25 ms
styles.css
10 ms
ga.js
227 ms
recaptcha__en.js
256 ms
style.css
66 ms
www.cidepix.com
287 ms
site-logo-plain.png
68 ms
logo-youtube.png
64 ms
logo-facebook.png
67 ms
logo-twitter.png
64 ms
logo-googlePlus.png
67 ms
promotion-vectors.jpg
70 ms
promotion-logo-icons.jpg
72 ms
2345-minipic.jpg
68 ms
2552-minipic.jpg
72 ms
2579-minipic.jpg
72 ms
2591-minipic.jpg
71 ms
2603-minipic.jpg
74 ms
2612-minipic.jpg
72 ms
2636-minipic.jpg
74 ms
2681-minipic.jpg
75 ms
7332-minipic.jpg
74 ms
7338-minipic.jpg
75 ms
7355-minipic.jpg
77 ms
8234-minipic.jpg
77 ms
8275-minipic.jpg
76 ms
8269-minipic.jpg
78 ms
8272-minipic.jpg
77 ms
8266-minipic.jpg
79 ms
8263-minipic.jpg
79 ms
8260-minipic.jpg
80 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
97 ms
__utm.gif
54 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
50 ms
fallback
25 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
payload
20 ms
css
57 ms
logo_48.png
3 ms
refresh.png
5 ms
audio.png
7 ms
cidepix.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
cidepix.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cidepix.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cidepix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cidepix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cidepix.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cidepix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: