2.5 sec in total
383 ms
2 sec
133 ms
Welcome to cight.com homepage info - get ready to check Cight best content right away, or after learning these important things about cight.com
Portal of Nick Holmes' creations and odd weblinks
Visit cight.comWe analyzed Cight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
cight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
24/100
10%
383 ms
700 ms
6 ms
378 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Cight.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Badge.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 30.7 kB (17%)
183.1 kB
152.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Cight.com main page is 183.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 121.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (42%)
57
33
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cight.com
383 ms
www.cight.com
700 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
logo.gif
378 ms
publisher-en.js
23 ms
670546745.6617.1781544443.png
1028 ms
rss.gif
258 ms
ca-pub-4316943036699548.js
128 ms
zrt_lookup.html
166 ms
show_ads_impl.js
58 ms
19 ms
13 ms
platform.js
132 ms
ads
239 ms
osd.js
21 ms
ads
178 ms
btn_viewmy_160x33.png
145 ms
badge_code_v2.gne
135 ms
jswidget.php
134 ms
urchin.js
15 ms
xhtml_t.gif
105 ms
css_s.gif
182 ms
firefox_s.gif
219 ms
apache-80x15.gif
225 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
12 ms
person
120 ms
postmessageRelay
38 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
23 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
37 ms
2476519792_6d703be767_s.jpg
165 ms
57964665_a56f13c4e6_s.jpg
162 ms
5136825475_7d08bcae40_s.jpg
160 ms
5531561691_2a9f47a2cb_s.jpg
182 ms
p
84 ms
2353131728_5e3ae5e56b_s.jpg
163 ms
28506064_5a12ab7a4d_s.jpg
83 ms
167698787_6246640e31_s.jpg
163 ms
63539206_c4a8a03a68_s.jpg
159 ms
1574090321.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
95 ms
2fe14debf8687ff59796f414141417241414141.jpg
161 ms
0747538492.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
84 ms
1571458212.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
140 ms
1902813618.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
156 ms
0385603401.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
84 ms
190608226X.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
139 ms
0747584699.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
155 ms
0061020648.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
139 ms
0552142352.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
155 ms
0552140287.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
154 ms
1857237641.01._SX43_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
154 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
rs=AGLTcCNp66tM0hVy40e06TtJciUTeCcbAg
17 ms
rs=AGLTcCPeW_yxohM6d2vzOu9_v18SNdO9Aw
17 ms
rs=AGLTcCNfkezdI7SeJ3I7S8mpQaZXktqjIA
68 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
abg.js
135 ms
photo.jpg
270 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
129 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
129 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
132 ms
rs=AGLTcCNfkezdI7SeJ3I7S8mpQaZXktqjIA
22 ms
rs=AGLTcCNfkezdI7SeJ3I7S8mpQaZXktqjIA
14 ms
cight.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
cight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
cight.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cight.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
cight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: