3 sec in total
505 ms
2.3 sec
285 ms
Welcome to circlewall.com homepage info - get ready to check Circle Wall best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about circlewall.com
Visit circlewall.comWe analyzed Circlewall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
circlewall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.6 s
58/100
10%
505 ms
182 ms
97 ms
289 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Circlewall.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (868 ms) belongs to the original domain Circlewall.com.
Page size can be reduced by 129.3 kB (12%)
1.1 MB
987.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Circlewall.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 961.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Circle Wall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Circlewall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)
16
12
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Circle Wall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
circle_new
505 ms
182 ms
login.css
97 ms
jquery-2.1.0.min.js
289 ms
bday-picker.js
189 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
190 ms
jquery.form-validator.min.js
193 ms
register.js
191 ms
bg_noise_site.jpg
99 ms
logo.png
96 ms
login_form_bg.png
98 ms
login_inpt_250.png
95 ms
login_inpt_160.png
98 ms
login_btn_in.png
98 ms
cb7e5-bremerton.jpg
589 ms
a549e-washington-dc.jpg
659 ms
6ea77-washington-monument-at-night.jpg
595 ms
65e4d-washington-square-park-manhattan-nyc.jpg
868 ms
circlewall.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
circlewall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
circlewall.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Circlewall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Circlewall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
circlewall.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Circle Wall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: