8 sec in total
323 ms
6.9 sec
848 ms
Visit citeq.de now to see the best up-to-date Citeq content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about citeq.de
Visit citeq.deWe analyzed Citeq.de page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
citeq.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
37/100
10%
Value390 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
323 ms
4050 ms
106 ms
215 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Citeq.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Citeq.de.
Page size can be reduced by 402.8 kB (29%)
1.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Citeq.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Citeq needs image optimization as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 166.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Citeq.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (33%)
63
42
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Citeq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
citeq.de
323 ms
index.html
4050 ms
stylesheet_ac3516da86.css
106 ms
basis.css
215 ms
lightbox.css
218 ms
form.css
218 ms
citeq.css
215 ms
jquery_1_5.min.js
322 ms
prototype.js
219 ms
lightbox.js
334 ms
effects.js
333 ms
javascript_b9ac716825.js
332 ms
slightbox.css
350 ms
piwik.js
354 ms
muensterde.gif
108 ms
mslogo36.gif
107 ms
citeq_03.jpg
219 ms
csm_CeBIT_2016_Bannergenerator_468x60px_D_b46929610d.png
109 ms
dom2_200.jpg
324 ms
Fluechtlings-Erstaufnahme-Einrichtung_200.jpg
219 ms
altstadt_200.jpg
429 ms
girls-day-logo_200.png
321 ms
CeBIT2015_200.jpg
323 ms
Logo_DataClearing_200.jpg
324 ms
factory_hotel_impressionen_200.jpg
325 ms
buergerhaushalt-logo-200.JPG
427 ms
CeBIT2014-banner1_d.jpg
430 ms
Modellkommune-nPA_200.jpg
639 ms
govdata_logo_200.png
430 ms
neuer-personalausweis200.jpg
431 ms
Schulen-Intern_200.jpg
641 ms
lupe.gif
533 ms
BMI_aus_2_mach_1_200.jpg
536 ms
messestand_cebit_klein.JPG
537 ms
Cebit_2013-nPA_200.jpg
537 ms
CeBIT-2013-banner_200.jpg
638 ms
LogoForm-Solutions_200.jpg
639 ms
Infotag-DMS-citeq-200.jpg
747 ms
Landgraf-Schoenfelder-01-200.jpg
643 ms
vorausgefuellter-Meldeschein_200.JPG
742 ms
csm_e-ausweis_4a2ea78783.jpg
744 ms
NeueAzubis2012_200.JPG
744 ms
OeV_Symposium_200.jpg
745 ms
13888_bild_mittel1_nrw_staedte_200.JPG
749 ms
Stadtwerke-MS_citeq_LVM_200.JPG
847 ms
Logo-neue-Verwaltung.JPG
851 ms
Girls-Day_Logo2012_teaser_rdax_140x80.jpg
850 ms
csm_02-Grafik-citeq-CeBIT-Fachverfahren-mit-eID_19d7da84dd.jpg
846 ms
csm_DienstplanM_web_ddd232eaab.jpg
842 ms
nPA.jpg
814 ms
csm_nPA_citeq_Mitarbeiter_web_ffd83cbe33.jpg
853 ms
header_middle_02.jpg
856 ms
header_right_02.jpg
853 ms
streifen.gif
743 ms
li_extern.gif
751 ms
li_intern2.gif
649 ms
li_intern.gif
747 ms
li_sprung.gif
746 ms
li_pdf.gif
743 ms
li_extern2.gif
743 ms
piwik.php
699 ms
basis_print.css
110 ms
form_print.css
106 ms
loading.gif
106 ms
close.gif
106 ms
citeq.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
citeq.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
citeq.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Citeq.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Citeq.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
citeq.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Citeq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: