2.8 sec in total
542 ms
1.9 sec
317 ms
Click here to check amazing Classic Press content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about classicpress.net
ClassicPress is a community-led open source content management system. A fork of WordPress 4.9, it retains the WordPress classic editor as the default option.
Visit classicpress.netWe analyzed Classicpress.net page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
classicpress.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
542 ms
27 ms
115 ms
21 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Classicpress.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) belongs to the original domain Classicpress.net.
Page size can be reduced by 35.3 kB (17%)
211.3 kB
176.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Classicpress.net main page is 211.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 112.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 682 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicpress.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)
20
12
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.classicpress.net
542 ms
13a01d3b85e0964eb510a3db8fae13da.css
27 ms
fd68b0f68aeb9a34fa856e943de4e36a.css
115 ms
283d199134eb2e2a89ab9d795169ac03.css
21 ms
94017595104c43906c4ab1891c4fee16.css
42 ms
82d28537abe4a923dcd1d578d458c959.css
22 ms
jquery.js
30 ms
4750dc4d57520b587494714a4ad1dffe.js
34 ms
ad1ca6266647bcd9347119d74aec551a.js
34 ms
4a03007c0dd60b522ca3827efe8c3486.js
39 ms
source-sans-pro-v12-latin-regular.woff
133 ms
source-sans-pro-v12-latin-600.woff
441 ms
source-sans-pro-v12-latin-700.woff
122 ms
cpicons.ttf
103 ms
source-sans-pro-v12-latin-italic.woff
120 ms
source-sans-pro-v12-latin-600italic.woff
139 ms
source-sans-pro-v12-latin-700italic.woff
229 ms
main.js
125 ms
logo-white.svg
11 ms
screenshot-optimized-noversion.png
14 ms
sliders-solid.svg
111 ms
bolt-lightning-solid.svg
10 ms
file-lines-regular.svg
108 ms
brinkman-it-sponsor.png
14 ms
tukutoi-sponsor.png
19 ms
classicpress-logo-feather-white.svg
116 ms
litespeed-webserver-logo.svg
21 ms
logo-white.png
24 ms
classicpress.net accessibility score
classicpress.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
classicpress.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicpress.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classicpress.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
classicpress.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Classic Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: