Tools & Wizards About Us
clearfield.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

clearfield.com

Home | Clearfield Software Ltd

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

839 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

129 ms

clearfield.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Clearfield content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clearfield.com

Professional software development for the enterprise, web application programming, website upgrades and mobile apps.

Visit clearfield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clearfield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 839 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clearfield.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,110 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value259.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clearfield.com

839 ms

style.css

570 ms

jquery.min.js

28 ms

back.png

384 ms

logo_title.png

762 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Clearfield.com, 17% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Clearfield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

165.6 kB

After Optimization

117.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clearfield.com main page is 165.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 124.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 124.7 kB
  • After minification 95.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clearfield needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clearfield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clearfield. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

clearfield.com

clearfield.com

839 ms

style.css

style.css

570 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

28 ms

back.png

back.png

384 ms

logo_title.png

logo_title.png

762 ms

logo_symbol.png

logo_symbol.png

386 ms

menu_selected.png

menu_selected.png

387 ms

menu.png

menu.png

386 ms

Staff%20strip.jpg

Staff%20strip.jpg

1184 ms

footer.png

footer.png

765 ms

ga.js

ga.js

29 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

clearfield.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

clearfield.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clearfield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clearfield.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

clearfield.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clearfield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: