Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

396 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

235 ms

clictout.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to clictout.com homepage info - get ready to check Clictout best content right away, or after learning these important things about clictout.com

Visit clictout.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clictout.com page load time and found that the first response time was 396 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clictout.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clictout.com

396 ms

www.clictout.fr

301 ms

web.css

86 ms

functions.js

167 ms

show_ads.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Clictout.com, 30% (31 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 21% (22 requests) were made to Clictout.fr. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.1 kB (3%)

Content Size

387.1 kB

After Optimization

375.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Clictout.com main page is 387.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 449 B

  • Original 766 B
  • After minification 751 B
  • After compression 317 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 449 B or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 342.2 kB
  • After minification 335.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clictout images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 40.3 kB
  • After minification 39.9 kB
  • After compression 38.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 755 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clictout.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (50%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clictout. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Best Practices

clictout.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

clictout.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clictout.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Clictout.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clictout. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: