2.1 sec in total
451 ms
1.4 sec
200 ms
Click here to check amazing CMO Survey content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cmosurvey.org
The CMO Survey collects and disseminates the opinions of top marketers to predict the future of markets, track marketing excellence, and improve the value of
Visit cmosurvey.orgWe analyzed Cmosurvey.org page load time and found that the first response time was 451 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
cmosurvey.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
451 ms
50 ms
35 ms
34 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Cmosurvey.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (690 ms) belongs to the original domain Cmosurvey.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (61%)
2.4 MB
933.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Cmosurvey.org main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 910.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CMO Survey needs image optimization as it can save up to 910.2 kB or 58% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 384.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 384.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cmosurvey.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (58%)
80
34
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CMO Survey. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cmosurvey.org
451 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
50 ms
avatars.css
35 ms
imgareaselect.css
34 ms
dashicons.min.css
67 ms
thickbox.css
35 ms
wp-testimonials-style.css
65 ms
cat-posts.css
68 ms
TinyLightbox.css
68 ms
main.min.css
71 ms
pop-widget.css
80 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
113 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
98 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
132 ms
style.css
98 ms
skripta.js
102 ms
ae_style.css
111 ms
jd.gallery.css.php
446 ms
jd.gallery.css
137 ms
mootools.v1.11.js
155 ms
jd.gallery.js.php
567 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.js
145 ms
swfobject.js
164 ms
reset.css
165 ms
960.css
178 ms
superfish.css
186 ms
fancybox.css
194 ms
development-styles.css
229 ms
jcarousellite.js
211 ms
sliderstyle.js
218 ms
jquery.easing.js
226 ms
hoverIntent.js
245 ms
superfish.js
251 ms
custom.js
260 ms
my_script.js
260 ms
cmosurvey.org
614 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
output.css
260 ms
style.css
268 ms
cmosurvey.org
690 ms
jquery.imgareaselect.min.js
287 ms
thickbox.js
286 ms
comment-reply.min.js
295 ms
pop-widget.js
302 ms
smooth.js
354 ms
dim.js
332 ms
2016-02-blog-graph-1200x582.png
36 ms
bg_outerWrapper2.png
35 ms
CMO_PixelSpray291x123_72_fix.png
117 ms
bg_input.gif
40 ms
bg_twoColumn.gif
40 ms
example-graphs.png
95 ms
slide_na1.jpg
111 ms
2016-02-blog-graph-slider.png
131 ms
slide_3.png
290 ms
2016-02-award-slider.png
246 ms
blank.gif
145 ms
deloitte-inverse-500x98.png
245 ms
ama-logo.jpg
245 ms
fuqua-logo.jpg
244 ms
headshot_christine.jpg
243 ms
bg_h1.gif
238 ms
fleche2.png
239 ms
fleche1.png
238 ms
sprite-32.png
281 ms
bg_footerWrapper2.gif
124 ms
bg_footerLogos.gif
165 ms
btn_linkedin3.png
164 ms
btn_twitter2.png
166 ms
btn_facebook3.png
166 ms
btn_rss2.png
166 ms
ga.js
30 ms
follow-right.png
105 ms
sprite-24.png
143 ms
next.png
48 ms
prev.png
54 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
83 ms
print.css
40 ms
300lo.json
35 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
26 ms
cmosurvey.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
cmosurvey.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cmosurvey.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cmosurvey.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cmosurvey.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cmosurvey.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CMO Survey. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: