928 ms in total
174 ms
517 ms
237 ms
Click here to check amazing Codecall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about codecall.net
The following is a comprehensive list of some of the most popular and praised IDEs for Java.
Visit codecall.netWe analyzed Codecall.net page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 754 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
codecall.net performance score
174 ms
28 ms
53 ms
24 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Codecall.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (229 ms) belongs to the original domain Codecall.net.
Page size can be reduced by 467.1 kB (41%)
1.1 MB
664.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Codecall.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 530.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codecall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 226.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 190.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codecall.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 190.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (68%)
37
12
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codecall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codecall.net
174 ms
swipebox.css
28 ms
style.css
53 ms
css
24 ms
genericons.css
76 ms
starter.css
101 ms
style.css
105 ms
colors.css
54 ms
jetpack.css
109 ms
jquery.js
151 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
77 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
106 ms
front.js
112 ms
jquery.cycle.js
185 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
133 ms
photon.js
134 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
57 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
133 ms
masonry.min.js
217 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
215 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
216 ms
scripts.js
220 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
229 ms
e-201547.js
4 ms
analytics.js
4 ms
collect
130 ms
collect
160 ms
codecall_logo.png
87 ms
img_5438d1df39d3f.png
90 ms
img_5438d00ab1109.png
79 ms
img_5438c988da174.png
86 ms
bluej30.gif
78 ms
googleappskindlefirehdx-5.png
77 ms
screen480x4801.jpeg
78 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
47 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
48 ms
Genericons.svg
99 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
6 ms
hovercard.css
52 ms
services.css
80 ms
g.gif
12 ms
codecall.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codecall.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Codecall.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codecall.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codecall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: