2.1 sec in total
173 ms
1.7 sec
171 ms
Visit codecodex.com now to see the best up-to-date Code Codex content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codecodex.com
Visit codecodex.comWe analyzed Codecodex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
codecodex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
173 ms
226 ms
379 ms
223 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Codecodex.com, 77% (30 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) relates to the external source S3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 108.0 kB (66%)
163.6 kB
55.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Codecodex.com main page is 163.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 69.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Code Codex needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codecodex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (82%)
38
7
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Code Codex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
Main_Page
173 ms
SyntaxHighlighter.css
226 ms
shCoreMods.js
379 ms
shBrushCpp.js
223 ms
shBrushCSharp.js
208 ms
shBrushCss.js
238 ms
shBrushDelphi.js
219 ms
shBrushJava.js
348 ms
shBrushJScript.js
369 ms
shBrushPhp.js
405 ms
shBrushPython.js
415 ms
shBrushRuby.js
376 ms
shBrushSql.js
491 ms
shBrushVb.js
503 ms
shBrushXml.js
516 ms
main.css
670 ms
wikibits.js
31 ms
commonPrint.css
5 ms
content.css
234 ms
template.css
142 ms
basetemplate.css
145 ms
cavendish.css
209 ms
ga.js
47 ms
wiki_header_logo.gif
82 ms
poweredby_mediawiki_88x31.png
24 ms
header_bl.png
170 ms
header_tl.gif
177 ms
header_br.gif
142 ms
header_tab.gif
141 ms
header_tr.gif
153 ms
menu_back.gif
28 ms
menu_tr.gif
151 ms
key-point_tl.gif
397 ms
menu_br.gif
303 ms
key-point_bl.gif
298 ms
external.png
289 ms
cred.coffee
60 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
dc.gif
101 ms
codecodex.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
codecodex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
codecodex.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codecodex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codecodex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codecodex.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Code Codex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: