Tools & Wizards About Us
codetunnel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

codetunnel.com

Chevtek.io

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

426 ms

codetunnel.com screenshot

About Website

Visit codetunnel.com now to see the best up-to-date Codetunnel content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codetunnel.com

import { knowledge } from "experience";

Visit codetunnel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Codetunnel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

codetunnel.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

codetunnel.com

1652 ms

prism.css

83 ms

screen.css

245 ms

css

28 ms

61ee1ef42c85803b7cdb06ffd476404a

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Codetunnel.com, 20% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Codetunnel.disqus.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Codetunnel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 133.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Codetunnel.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 11.9 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Codetunnel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 110.2 kB

  • Original 174.6 kB
  • After minification 173.0 kB
  • After compression 64.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (43%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codetunnel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

codetunnel.com

codetunnel.com

1652 ms

prism.css

prism.css

83 ms

screen.css

screen.css

245 ms

css

css

28 ms

61ee1ef42c85803b7cdb06ffd476404a

61ee1ef42c85803b7cdb06ffd476404a

53 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

373 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

173 ms

index.js

index.js

173 ms

prism.js

prism.js

293 ms

CodeTunnel_Final_Resized-4.png

CodeTunnel_Final_Resized-4.png

353 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

872 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf

6 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

21 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

23 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

22 ms

casper-icons.woff

casper-icons.woff

169 ms

count.js

count.js

22 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

6 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

count-data.js

count-data.js

138 ms

SEO Factors

codetunnel.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codetunnel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Codetunnel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

codetunnel.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Codetunnel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: