Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

commonprayer.org

番茄视频APP下载,番茄视频APP,番茄视频

Page Load Speed

679 ms in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

400 ms

Page Rendered

134 ms

commonprayer.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Commonprayer content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about commonprayer.org

Morning and Evening Prayer from the 1928 Book of Common Prayer, Hourly Offices, the Ordo Calendar, and other Traditional Episcopal/Anglican Resources

Visit commonprayer.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Commonprayer.org page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 534 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

commonprayer.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

commonprayer.org

145 ms

index.cfm

40 ms

twitter-c.png

158 ms

bg1.jpg

31 ms

pray1.gif

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Commonprayer.org, 8% (1 request) were made to Twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (195 ms) belongs to the original domain Commonprayer.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 860 B (17%)

Content Size

4.9 kB

After Optimization

4.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Commonprayer.org main page is 4.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 323 B

  • Original 743 B
  • After minification 733 B
  • After compression 420 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 323 B or 43% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 537 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 3.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Commonprayer needs image optimization as it can save up to 537 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Commonprayer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

commonprayer.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

commonprayer.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

commonprayer.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Commonprayer.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Commonprayer.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Commonprayer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: