Tools & Wizards About Us
comparalo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

comparalo.com

Compara y Ahorra

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

354 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

comparalo.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Compara Lo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about comparalo.com

Sitio web de finanzas personales y tips de ahorro

Visit comparalo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparalo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparalo.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.258

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparalo.com

354 ms

www.comparalo.com

1307 ms

debug.css

111 ms

styles.css

205 ms

utilities.js

321 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Comparalo.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparalo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 606.3 kB (77%)

Content Size

782.7 kB

After Optimization

176.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparalo.com main page is 782.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 564.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 19.6 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 97 B

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 30.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compara Lo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 447.4 kB

  • Original 564.0 kB
  • After minification 444.8 kB
  • After compression 116.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 142.5 kB

  • Original 166.4 kB
  • After minification 153.9 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparalo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (84%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compara Lo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparalo.com

comparalo.com

354 ms

www.comparalo.com

www.comparalo.com

1307 ms

debug.css

debug.css

111 ms

styles.css

styles.css

205 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

321 ms

yahoo-dom-event.js

yahoo-dom-event.js

228 ms

dom-min.js

dom-min.js

224 ms

dragdrop-min.js

dragdrop-min.js

228 ms

slider.js

slider.js

227 ms

container-min.js

container-min.js

413 ms

numberFormat.js

numberFormat.js

332 ms

comparadores.js

comparadores.js

339 ms

common.js

common.js

345 ms

calculadoras.js

calculadoras.js

343 ms

sliders.js

sliders.js

432 ms

jquery-1.2.4a.js

jquery-1.2.4a.js

564 ms

loadingpanel.js

loadingpanel.js

444 ms

jquery-dom.js

jquery-dom.js

454 ms

common.css

common.css

257 ms

layout.css

layout.css

311 ms

presentation.css

presentation.css

337 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

355 ms

skin.css

skin.css

370 ms

bck_wrap.gif

bck_wrap.gif

107 ms

bck_header.gif

bck_header.gif

115 ms

logo_antenveniobank.gif

logo_antenveniobank.gif

111 ms

bg_bread.png

bg_bread.png

120 ms

bg_formBuscar.png

bg_formBuscar.png

111 ms

bt_buscar.png

bt_buscar.png

117 ms

bg_navBarNone.png

bg_navBarNone.png

207 ms

bg_pestana_green.gif

bg_pestana_green.gif

207 ms

bg_pestana_red.gif

bg_pestana_red.gif

210 ms

bg_pestana_yellow.gif

bg_pestana_yellow.gif

228 ms

bg_pestana_blue_last.gif

bg_pestana_blue_last.gif

228 ms

bt_calcular.png

bt_calcular.png

225 ms

cuenta-nomina-ing.gif

cuenta-nomina-ing.gif

403 ms

mutua-madilena.jpg

mutua-madilena.jpg

309 ms

seguros-genesis.jpg

seguros-genesis.jpg

311 ms

bg_modBlue.png

bg_modBlue.png

333 ms

bullet_amarillo.png

bullet_amarillo.png

336 ms

ico_rss.png

ico_rss.png

334 ms

ico_print.gif

ico_print.gif

407 ms

bg_newsletter.png

bg_newsletter.png

411 ms

bt_enviar.png

bt_enviar.png

441 ms

bg_newsletter2.png

bg_newsletter2.png

441 ms

bullet_herramienta.png

bullet_herramienta.png

450 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

impresion.css

impresion.css

103 ms

top_left_modPeq.png

top_left_modPeq.png

104 ms

top_right_modPeq.png

top_right_modPeq.png

116 ms

top_right_interior.png

top_right_interior.png

105 ms

bottom_left_interior.png

bottom_left_interior.png

112 ms

bottom_right_interior.png

bottom_right_interior.png

105 ms

top_left_modBlue.png

top_left_modBlue.png

114 ms

top_right_modBlue.png

top_right_modBlue.png

211 ms

bottom_left_modBlue.png

bottom_left_modBlue.png

211 ms

bottom_right_modBlue.png

bottom_right_modBlue.png

210 ms

Accessibility Review

comparalo.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

comparalo.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

comparalo.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparalo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparalo.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparalo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compara Lo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: