1.8 sec in total
58 ms
1.3 sec
439 ms
Welcome to comparebookings.com homepage info - get ready to check Comparebookings best content right away, or after learning these important things about comparebookings.com
Compare Bookings searches all the top travel sites to find the best deals on over 430,000 hotels. Best Price Guaranteed at Compare Bookings!
Visit comparebookings.comWe analyzed Comparebookings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
comparebookings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value2,650 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
58 ms
227 ms
306 ms
258 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Comparebookings.com, 39% (17 requests) were made to Cdn.datahc.com and 36% (16 requests) were made to Media.datahc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (315 ms) relates to the external source Media.datahc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 133.4 kB (29%)
460.3 kB
326.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparebookings.com main page is 460.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 301.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Comparebookings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)
39
26
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparebookings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparebookings.com
58 ms
www.comparebookings.com
227 ms
Style.ashx
306 ms
Style.ashx
258 ms
Style.ashx
282 ms
StyleSheet.ashx
81 ms
Master
87 ms
gif.gif
315 ms
Z1096449.jpg
153 ms
Z1077492.jpg
151 ms
Z1489304.jpg
153 ms
hc_bg_overlay.png
78 ms
hc_loader1.gif
10 ms
hc_pixel.gif
7 ms
hc_star_8bit.png
76 ms
poweredby_hotelscombined.png
7 ms
hc_flags.png
73 ms
mobileicons_20140905.woff
96 ms
icons_20160303.woff
70 ms
hc_icon_calendar_inverse.gif
14 ms
hc_bg_divider.gif
20 ms
hc_providerLogos_h50.png
26 ms
PT49192.jpg
80 ms
PT55165.jpg
60 ms
PT47295.jpg
50 ms
PT49361.jpg
57 ms
PT158584.jpg
55 ms
PT43958.jpg
61 ms
PT48989.jpg
63 ms
PT57663.jpg
66 ms
PT253763.jpg
60 ms
PT24399.jpg
63 ms
PT48733.jpg
61 ms
PT33373.jpg
65 ms
hc_flags_8bit.png
63 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
ec.js
17 ms
collect
59 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
29 ms
collect
77 ms
collect
22 ms
collect
23 ms
ga-audiences
50 ms
comparebookings.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
comparebookings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
comparebookings.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparebookings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Comparebookings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparebookings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Comparebookings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: