2.7 sec in total
397 ms
2.1 sec
227 ms
Visit comparecompensationclaims.com now to see the best up-to-date Compare Compensation Claims content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparecompensationclaims.com
Compare top injury law firms for the best accident claim deals for your personal injury. Maximise your claim in seconds with CompareCompensationClaims.com.
Visit comparecompensationclaims.comWe analyzed Comparecompensationclaims.com page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
comparecompensationclaims.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value450 ms
62/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
397 ms
94 ms
172 ms
181 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Comparecompensationclaims.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to A.collective-media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (705 ms) belongs to the original domain Comparecompensationclaims.com.
Page size can be reduced by 347.5 kB (46%)
758.6 kB
411.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparecompensationclaims.com main page is 758.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 457.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Compensation Claims images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 261.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.1 kB or 57% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (59%)
97
40
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Compensation Claims. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparecompensationclaims.com
397 ms
styles-common.css
94 ms
styles-float-ads.css
172 ms
styles.css
181 ms
styles-screen.css
175 ms
styles-calendar.css
172 ms
functions.js
178 ms
errorreporting-system.js
182 ms
general.js
254 ms
jquery.min.js
12 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
12 ms
png.js
257 ms
images.js
260 ms
loading.js
272 ms
swfobject.js
264 ms
width.js
270 ms
enquiry.js
337 ms
addthis_widget.js
22 ms
plusone.js
60 ms
ads-scroll.js
358 ms
prompt.js
348 ms
cookies-checker.js
372 ms
enquiry.css
200 ms
styles-profile.css
207 ms
styles-navigator.css
257 ms
styles-library.css
269 ms
sm-share-en.gif
9 ms
1.jpg
128 ms
logo.png
128 ms
instant-claim-or-answers.png
127 ms
send.png
129 ms
slogan.gif
128 ms
submit.gif
128 ms
1.jpg
381 ms
1-choose-an-accident-category.png
298 ms
2-search-personal-injury-specialist.png
298 ms
by-distance.png
296 ms
by-name.png
296 ms
by-rating.png
286 ms
blank.gif
349 ms
latest-news-and-blog.png
385 ms
facebook.gif
377 ms
twitter.gif
389 ms
youtube.gif
388 ms
logo-brick.gif
437 ms
basket-message.gif
478 ms
5.png
451 ms
telephone.gif
460 ms
menu-item.png
421 ms
shell.gif
439 ms
curve4.png
480 ms
1.png
587 ms
2.png
513 ms
2.png
535 ms
road-traffic-acccident-%28accident-category%29.png
546 ms
slip-trip-or-fall-%28accident-category%29.png
545 ms
public-liability-%28accident-category%29.png
579 ms
medical-negligence-%28accident-category%29.png
608 ms
criminal-injury-%28accident-category%29.png
635 ms
motorcycle-accident-%28accident-category%29.png
646 ms
accident-at-work-%28accident-category%29.png
653 ms
industrial-disease-illness-%28accident-category%29.png
680 ms
uninsured-drivers-%28accident-category%29.png
698 ms
military-accident-%28accident-category%29.png
644 ms
defective-products-%28accident-category%29.png
670 ms
sports-injury-%28accident-category%29.png
700 ms
4.png
675 ms
5.png
704 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
45 ms
6.png
705 ms
ga.js
38 ms
300lo.json
86 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
6 ms
fastbutton
98 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
72 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
postmessageRelay
82 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
24 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
37 ms
datapair
57 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
53 ms
datapair
52 ms
datapair
52 ms
datapair
52 ms
search.png
587 ms
curve6a.png
593 ms
2.gif
617 ms
1.gif
608 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
39 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
35 ms
close.gif
585 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
case.png
560 ms
1.png
640 ms
3.png
638 ms
2.png
632 ms
pixel
18 ms
pixel
13 ms
styles-print.css
88 ms
underline.gif
80 ms
comparecompensationclaims.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
comparecompensationclaims.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
comparecompensationclaims.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparecompensationclaims.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparecompensationclaims.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
comparecompensationclaims.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Compensation Claims. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: