8.3 sec in total
115 ms
5.9 sec
2.3 sec
Welcome to comparenetworks.com homepage info - get ready to check Compare Networks best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about comparenetworks.com
CompareNetworks Inc. - We help scientists, engineers, healthcare and business professionals stay informed and find/learn about the tools that drive discovery, safety, productivity and progress.
Visit comparenetworks.comWe analyzed Comparenetworks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
comparenetworks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value30.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.7 s
1/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value27.4 s
0/100
10%
115 ms
2285 ms
140 ms
244 ms
355 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Comparenetworks.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Corp.comparenetworks.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparenetworks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 68.0 kB (2%)
4.2 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Comparenetworks.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Networks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparenetworks.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (40%)
95
57
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Networks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
comparenetworks.com
115 ms
CommonStyleSheet.ashx
2285 ms
AllSitesCommonJavaScript.ashx
140 ms
css
244 ms
fontawesome.css
355 ms
adsbygoogle.js
354 ms
CnCorp-Omniture.js
384 ms
email-decode.min.js
95 ms
smoothscroll.js
135 ms
waypoints.min.js
180 ms
wow.min.js
222 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
223 ms
jquery.stellar.js
242 ms
jquery.sticky.js
240 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
284 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
302 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
302 ms
moderniz.min.js
378 ms
jquery.liquid-slider.js
377 ms
bootstrap.min.js
377 ms
jquery.min.js
345 ms
js
376 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
377 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
377 ms
gmap3.min.js
414 ms
scripts-test.js
411 ms
widgets.js
400 ms
AllSitesCommonFooterJavaScript.ashx
435 ms
CommonJavaScript.ashx
431 ms
54.png
297 ms
20.png
496 ms
52.jpg
710 ms
imSMART.png
192 ms
53.png
943 ms
cn-logo.png
192 ms
content-hub.jpg
288 ms
imSMART.jpg
199 ms
BC_logo.svg
200 ms
GlobalSpec.svg
205 ms
apr.svg
206 ms
po.svg
211 ms
lab.png
285 ms
odweb.svg
305 ms
oweb.svg
301 ms
dc.svg
296 ms
paul-gatti.png
482 ms
andy-miller.png
482 ms
mike-okimoto.jpg
436 ms
jason-roy.jpg
485 ms
Joan.png
493 ms
Doug.png
483 ms
Jeanely.png
489 ms
Alissa2.png
754 ms
Mike2.png
726 ms
Wendy.png
754 ms
Lisa.png
726 ms
Bo.png
726 ms
Laura.png
724 ms
Kelly.png
932 ms
logo-footer.png
928 ms
show_ads_impl.js
311 ms
zrt_lookup.html
582 ms
ga.js
516 ms
973 ms
home-hero.png
1657 ms
black-50.png
660 ms
icon-device.svg
759 ms
icon-bullseye.svg
971 ms
icon-tablet.svg
984 ms
icon-multimediaico.svg
986 ms
icon-bio.svg
1633 ms
icon-pharma.svg
1638 ms
icon-lab.svg
1634 ms
icon-optometry.svg
1621 ms
tweets-white.svg
1636 ms
facebook-white.svg
1663 ms
linkedin-white.svg
1671 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
791 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
992 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
1447 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
1447 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
1452 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
1466 ms
cookie.js
1323 ms
integrator.js
1295 ms
ads
383 ms
s1878904254641
564 ms
__utm.gif
891 ms
ts.js
1384 ms
ControlJavaScript.ashx
858 ms
s15661205227952
852 ms
__utm.gif
725 ms
ads
525 ms
gen_204
451 ms
all.js
342 ms
widget_iframe.9d00f3a022654eb8edfbc3190e981f9d.html
269 ms
home-hero.png
99 ms
icon_salesenablement.svg
214 ms
all.js
207 ms
icon_imsmart.svg
324 ms
icon_globalspec.svg
324 ms
settings
350 ms
259 ms
comparenetworks.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
comparenetworks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
comparenetworks.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparenetworks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparenetworks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
comparenetworks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare Networks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: