Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

comparethecoffin.com

Coffins in UK – Compare and Buy Funeral Coffins and Caskets | Compare The Coffin

Page Load Speed

16.5 sec in total

First Response

6.4 sec

Resources Loaded

9.7 sec

Page Rendered

349 ms

comparethecoffin.com screenshot

About Website

Visit comparethecoffin.com now to see the best up-to-date Compare The Coffin content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparethecoffin.com

Official website of Compare the Coffin for comparing coffins, caskets, and funeral prices. Designed to assist and inform you speedily and efficiently.

Visit comparethecoffin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparethecoffin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.4 sec and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparethecoffin.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,630 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.165

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparethecoffin.com

6434 ms

css_68435df7b3367e049cf2faee76a52b2f.css

412 ms

js_3d326b5b33f7a306794612546b1ff284.js

493 ms

compare.css

742 ms

colorbox.css

257 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Comparethecoffin.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparethecoffin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (61%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Comparethecoffin.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 134.3 kB

  • Original 174.6 kB
  • After minification 170.3 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 485.2 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 791.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Compare The Coffin needs image optimization as it can save up to 485.2 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 936.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 408.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 936.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 498.2 kB

  • Original 585.0 kB
  • After minification 531.5 kB
  • After compression 86.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparethecoffin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 498.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (61%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

41

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare The Coffin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

comparethecoffin.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

comparethecoffin.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparethecoffin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparethecoffin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Compare The Coffin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: