Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

competitivealternatives.com

MMK Consulting – Projects

Page Load Speed

21.7 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

16.7 sec

Page Rendered

3.8 sec

competitivealternatives.com screenshot

About Website

Visit competitivealternatives.com now to see the best up-to-date Competitivealternatives content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about competitivealternatives.com

Competitive Alternatives, KPMG's guide to international business costs. Home page.

Visit competitivealternatives.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Competitivealternatives.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 20.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

competitivealternatives.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

default.aspx

1197 ms

responsivefix.js

197 ms

require.js

233 ms

global.css

879 ms

tmpl-home.css

525 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Competitivealternatives.com, 13% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Competitivealternatives.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 980.0 kB (65%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

519.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Competitivealternatives.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 919.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 138.1 kB

  • Original 168.5 kB
  • After minification 149.8 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 163.0 kB
  • After minification 160.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Competitivealternatives images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 635.7 kB

  • Original 919.7 kB
  • After minification 919.7 kB
  • After compression 284.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 635.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 203.9 kB

  • Original 248.3 kB
  • After minification 240.8 kB
  • After compression 44.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Competitivealternatives.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (33%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Competitivealternatives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

competitivealternatives.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

competitivealternatives.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

competitivealternatives.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Competitivealternatives.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Competitivealternatives.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Competitivealternatives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: