6.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.4 sec
2.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Computepatterns content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about computepatterns.com
Visit computepatterns.comWe analyzed Computepatterns.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
computepatterns.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
1167 ms
154 ms
137 ms
186 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Computepatterns.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Computepatterns.com.
Page size can be reduced by 569.9 kB (76%)
745.5 kB
175.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Computepatterns.com main page is 745.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 405.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.8 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Computepatterns images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 174.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 320.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Computepatterns.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 320.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (84%)
45
7
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Computepatterns. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
computepatterns.com
1167 ms
analytics.js
154 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
137 ms
embed-pdf-viewer.css
186 ms
style.min.css
186 ms
theme.min.css
182 ms
font-awesome.min.css
200 ms
css
46 ms
frontend.css
172 ms
cool-tag-cloud.css
178 ms
dashicons.min.css
293 ms
css
120 ms
style.css
302 ms
style.css
243 ms
css
119 ms
font-awesome.min.css
246 ms
slick.css
231 ms
slick-theme.css
240 ms
enlighterjs.min.css
356 ms
ytprefs.min.css
308 ms
frontend.min.js
342 ms
jquery.js
402 ms
ytprefs.min.js
352 ms
frontend.js
389 ms
comment_count.js
578 ms
refined-news-custom.js
731 ms
slick.min.js
732 ms
core.min.js
735 ms
widget.min.js
735 ms
tabs.min.js
733 ms
navigation.js
731 ms
jquery.marquee.js
741 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
751 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
762 ms
refined-magazine-custom.js
761 ms
enlighterjs.min.js
763 ms
fitvids.min.js
761 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
772 ms
maxmegamenu.js
770 ms
wp-embed.min.js
769 ms
collect
99 ms
collect
62 ms
viewer
914 ms
btn_viewmy_160x33.png
613 ms
default-header.jpg
459 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e2fxHiD.ttf
72 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYCSShiA.ttf
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
401 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
409 ms
mFT0WbgBwKPR_Z4hGN2qgx8D0GB4m9w.ttf
85 ms
count.js
396 ms
rs=AC2dHMLrLY2VSPvqD4VkqQgAheoG7Zc1aw
260 ms
m=main
258 ms
client.js
258 ms
thumb
257 ms
computepatterns.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
computepatterns.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
computepatterns.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Computepatterns.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Computepatterns.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
computepatterns.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Computepatterns. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: