Tools & Wizards About Us
computergap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

computergap.com

Computer Fundamentals Study Notes - ComputerGap.com

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

432 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

computergap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Computer Gap content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about computergap.com

Computer Fundamentals Study Notes - Basic Topics about Computer, Computer Hardware, Computer software, Computer Scince

Visit computergap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Computergap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

computergap.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

computergap.com

432 ms

computergap.com

1306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

190 ms

style.min.css

303 ms

blocks.style.build.css

419 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Computergap.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Computergap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 76.2 kB (32%)

Content Size

240.5 kB

After Optimization

164.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Computergap.com main page is 240.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 106.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 90.1 kB
  • After minification 87.8 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Computer Gap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 835 B

  • Original 106.3 kB
  • After minification 106.3 kB
  • After compression 105.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 28.6 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Computergap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (80%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Computer Gap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

computergap.com

computergap.com

432 ms

computergap.com

computergap.com

1306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

190 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

303 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

419 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

397 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

389 ms

wpp.css

wpp.css

392 ms

css

css

126 ms

style.css

style.css

393 ms

custom.css

custom.css

425 ms

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

508 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

628 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

537 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

523 ms

wpp.min.js

wpp.min.js

514 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

154 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

191 ms

ads.js

ads.js

538 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

620 ms

selectnav.js

selectnav.js

1474 ms

ads.js

ads.js

1474 ms

moatframe.js

moatframe.js

728 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

511 ms

computergap-computer-fundamentals-300x183.jpg

computergap-computer-fundamentals-300x183.jpg

567 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf

187 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf

181 ms

computergap-computer-fundamentals-300x183.jpg

computergap-computer-fundamentals-300x183.jpg

401 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

204 ms

sh.f48a1a04fe8dbf021b4cda1d.html

sh.f48a1a04fe8dbf021b4cda1d.html

144 ms

Accessibility Review

computergap.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

computergap.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

computergap.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Computergap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Computergap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

computergap.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Computer Gap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: