1.9 sec in total
222 ms
1.3 sec
401 ms
Click here to check amazing Conduit content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about conduit.repair
We provide services to remove conduit search permanently from your computer. Conduit virus is permanently removed without uninstalling any other software program. We fine tune your computer for best p...
Visit conduit.repairWe analyzed Conduit.repair page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
conduit.repair performance score
222 ms
352 ms
126 ms
66 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Conduit.repair, 11% (5 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (4 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) belongs to the original domain Conduit.repair.
Page size can be reduced by 338.6 kB (52%)
654.9 kB
316.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Conduit.repair main page is 654.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 258.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Conduit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 81.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 213.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conduit.repair needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)
41
27
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conduit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
conduit.repair
222 ms
www.conduit.repair
352 ms
responsive.js
126 ms
jquery.min.js
66 ms
geo_redirect.js
166 ms
conduit-virus-image.png
342 ms
conduit-search_virus-1.jpg
344 ms
icon1.jpg
340 ms
icon2.jpg
339 ms
icon3.jpg
339 ms
ZO94bMjLICw
116 ms
sdk.js
22 ms
analytics.js
53 ms
chatra.js
93 ms
nav-span_1.png
320 ms
SatisfactionGuarantee.jpg
323 ms
p2.jpg
321 ms
p1.jpg
320 ms
p3.jpg
374 ms
Remove-conduit.jpg
374 ms
Conduit-search-removal.jpg
375 ms
271 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
46 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
63 ms
collect
40 ms
chat.chatra.io
287 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
11 ms
www-embed-player.js
25 ms
base.js
48 ms
ipinfo.io
182 ms
id
176 ms
2tj_Yt5eAEN1YazL-za5nq2m-sVEuK50_GPDTIKqlPM.js
190 ms
ad_status.js
175 ms
page.php
170 ms
www.conduit.repair
282 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
279 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
307 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
274 ms
YrFakaCOmcf.css
229 ms
BWRIL9-XbYW.js
237 ms
JrFVMrRpAYB.js
266 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
266 ms
8bf9ce80e42f489fd3f8e4070fffa3105d5b93d6.css
13 ms
2f59577206c60e2f852455d8cd9307ea6b02509b.js
64 ms
16427668_1269487373133832_6328826528928053875_n.png
40 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
18 ms
conduit.repair SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conduit.repair can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Conduit.repair main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
conduit.repair
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Conduit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: