Tools & Wizards About Us
conjoon.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

conjoon.com

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

conjoon.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to conjoon.com homepage info - get ready to check Conjoon best content right away, or after learning these important things about conjoon.com

webmail made easy

Visit conjoon.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Conjoon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

conjoon.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

conjoon.com

341 ms

jquery.js

211 ms

conjoon.com

229 ms

style.css

187 ms

conjoon.com

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Conjoon.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Conjoon.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 354.8 kB (41%)

Content Size

871.2 kB

After Optimization

516.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Conjoon.com main page is 871.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 461.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 29.7 kB
  • After minification 25.1 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 70.1 kB

  • Original 461.0 kB
  • After minification 390.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Conjoon needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 201.1 kB

  • Original 311.9 kB
  • After minification 300.5 kB
  • After compression 110.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 58.7 kB

  • Original 68.7 kB
  • After minification 53.5 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Conjoon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Conjoon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

conjoon.com

conjoon.com

341 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

211 ms

conjoon.com

conjoon.com

229 ms

style.css

style.css

187 ms

conjoon.com

conjoon.com

231 ms

deep_ocean.css

deep_ocean.css

198 ms

conjoon.com

conjoon.com

233 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

379 ms

overallmenu.js

overallmenu.js

294 ms

jquery.cycle.min.js

jquery.cycle.min.js

304 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

327 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

326 ms

Futura_Bk_BT_400.font.js

Futura_Bk_BT_400.font.js

425 ms

custom.js

custom.js

387 ms

reset.css

reset.css

170 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

193 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

196 ms

style.css

style.css

249 ms

header_bg.png

header_bg.png

129 ms

logo.png

logo.png

128 ms

banner_bg.png

banner_bg.png

129 ms

webmailmadeeasy2.png

webmailmadeeasy2.png

247 ms

email_account.png

email_account.png

217 ms

folder_management.png

folder_management.png

337 ms

reading_emails.png

reading_emails.png

300 ms

watching_youtube.png

watching_youtube.png

412 ms

banner_button.png

banner_button.png

233 ms

headlines_bg.png

headlines_bg.png

309 ms

started.png

started.png

325 ms

bullhorn.png

bullhorn.png

339 ms

intro_top_bg.png

intro_top_bg.png

394 ms

intro_image.png

intro_image.png

400 ms

widget_image.png

widget_image.png

424 ms

screenshot1_small.jpg

screenshot1_small.jpg

526 ms

screenshot43.jpg

screenshot43.jpg

525 ms

wizard-1.jpg

wizard-1.jpg

581 ms

footer_widget_bg.png

footer_widget_bg.png

499 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

500 ms

footer_widget_line.png

footer_widget_line.png

513 ms

footer_started.png

footer_started.png

594 ms

footer_home.png

footer_home.png

593 ms

footer_email.png

footer_email.png

606 ms

footer_support.png

footer_support.png

617 ms

footer_copyright_bg.png

footer_copyright_bg.png

616 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

673 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

684 ms

ga.js

ga.js

46 ms

fade_loader.gif

fade_loader.gif

569 ms

banner_button_active.png

banner_button_active.png

581 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

593 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

594 ms

up.png

up.png

652 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

SEO Factors

conjoon.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Conjoon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Conjoon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

conjoon.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Conjoon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: