Tools & Wizards About Us
consideo-shop.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

consideo-shop.de

CONSIDEO GmbH

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

893 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

consideo-shop.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to consideo-shop.de homepage info - get ready to check CONSIDEO Shop best content right away, or after learning these important things about consideo-shop.de

CONSIDEO GmbH

Visit consideo-shop.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Consideo-shop.de page load time and found that the first response time was 893 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

consideo-shop.de performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.consideo-shop.de

893 ms

css

25 ms

css

37 ms

css

44 ms

jquery-1.7.min.js

257 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Consideo-shop.de, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (893 ms) belongs to the original domain Consideo-shop.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 717.3 kB (74%)

Content Size

968.1 kB

After Optimization

250.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Consideo-shop.de main page is 968.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 543.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

  • Original 43.0 kB
  • After minification 37.0 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 153.4 kB
  • After minification 88.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CONSIDEO Shop needs image optimization as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 419.7 kB

  • Original 543.5 kB
  • After minification 427.3 kB
  • After compression 123.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 196.6 kB

  • Original 228.2 kB
  • After minification 179.7 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Consideo-shop.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (76%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CONSIDEO Shop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.consideo-shop.de

www.consideo-shop.de

893 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

44 ms

jquery-1.7.min.js

jquery-1.7.min.js

257 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

212 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

218 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

219 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

218 ms

easyTooltip.js

easyTooltip.js

214 ms

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

jquery.jcarousel.min.js

319 ms

jquery.iosslider.min.js

jquery.iosslider.min.js

327 ms

styles.css

styles.css

438 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

330 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

325 ms

camera.css

camera.css

362 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

425 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

546 ms

ccard.js

ccard.js

433 ms

validation.js

validation.js

435 ms

builder.js

builder.js

470 ms

effects.js

effects.js

533 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

545 ms

controls.js

controls.js

542 ms

slider.js

slider.js

541 ms

js.js

js.js

577 ms

form.js

form.js

637 ms

translate.js

translate.js

646 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

646 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

215 ms

bnr_nowAccepting_150x60.gif

bnr_nowAccepting_150x60.gif

63 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

113 ms

body-bg1.jpg

body-bg1.jpg

215 ms

header-buttons.gif

header-buttons.gif

113 ms

marker-9.gif

marker-9.gif

114 ms

button-login.png

button-login.png

113 ms

button-menu.png

button-menu.png

112 ms

store_logo.png

store_logo.png

218 ms

form-search.gif

form-search.gif

211 ms

i_asc_arrow.gif

i_asc_arrow.gif

217 ms

imlogo_4.png

imlogo_4.png

317 ms

imlogo_13.png

imlogo_13.png

213 ms

imlogo_15.png

imlogo_15.png

324 ms

imlogo_15_1.png

imlogo_15_1.png

320 ms

imlogo_13_1.png

imlogo_13_1.png

324 ms

imlogo_4_1.png

imlogo_4_1.png

421 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

294 ms

nav-bg.jpg

nav-bg.jpg

386 ms

marker-8.gif

marker-8.gif

390 ms

home-bg.gif

home-bg.gif

390 ms

grid-list.gif

grid-list.gif

389 ms

link-wishlist2.png

link-wishlist2.png

389 ms

link-compare2.png

link-compare2.png

492 ms

marker-1.gif

marker-1.gif

477 ms

print.css

print.css

108 ms

Accessibility Review

consideo-shop.de accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

consideo-shop.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

consideo-shop.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Consideo-shop.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Consideo-shop.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

consideo-shop.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CONSIDEO Shop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: