Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

construction.cioapplications.com

Technology Trends in the Construction Industry | CIO Applications

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

432 ms

construction.cioapplications.com screenshot

About Website

Visit construction.cioapplications.com now to see the best up-to-date Construction CIO Applications content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about construction.cioapplications.com

CIO Applications magazine helps to broaden your perspectives and unleash the benefits of cutting-edge technology in assuring flexibility, accuracy and seamless coordination from back office to jobsite...

Visit construction.cioapplications.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Construction.cioapplications.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

construction.cioapplications.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,370 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.12

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

construction.cioapplications.com

128 ms

construction.cioapplications.com

564 ms

css

74 ms

font-awesome.min4906.css

146 ms

css.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 151 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Construction.cioapplications.com, 26% (40 requests) were made to Cioapplications.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Construction.cioapplications.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 393.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Construction.cioapplications.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 176.8 kB

  • Original 204.6 kB
  • After minification 153.9 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 50.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 107.5 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Construction CIO Applications images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 88.0 kB

  • Original 586.8 kB
  • After minification 586.7 kB
  • After compression 498.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 112.4 kB
  • After minification 109.5 kB
  • After compression 91.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Construction.cioapplications.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (53%)

Requests Now

133

After Optimization

63

The browser has sent 133 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Construction CIO Applications. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

construction.cioapplications.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

construction.cioapplications.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

construction.cioapplications.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Construction.cioapplications.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Construction.cioapplications.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Construction CIO Applications. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: