Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

constructioncardmocktest.com

CSCS Mock Test | CSCS Revision | CSCS Test Questions – Free CSCS Mock Test Questions and Revision Materials

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

245 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

577 ms

constructioncardmocktest.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to constructioncardmocktest.com homepage info - get ready to check Constructioncard Mock Test best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about constructioncardmocktest.com

Visit constructioncardmocktest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructioncardmocktest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructioncardmocktest.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

constructioncardmocktest.com

245 ms

builderstest.com

381 ms

style.css

367 ms

style-font.css

181 ms

vision-shortcodes.css

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Constructioncardmocktest.com, 81% (55 requests) were made to Builderstest.ralphjodah.netdna-cdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Builderstest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) relates to the external source Builderstest.ralphjodah.netdna-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 344.3 kB (55%)

Content Size

623.9 kB

After Optimization

279.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Constructioncardmocktest.com main page is 623.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 219.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 64.3 kB

  • Original 79.5 kB
  • After minification 75.7 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 165.6 kB
  • After minification 160.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Constructioncard Mock Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 143.5 kB

  • Original 219.5 kB
  • After minification 217.7 kB
  • After compression 76.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 131.3 kB

  • Original 159.3 kB
  • After minification 155.5 kB
  • After compression 28.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructioncardmocktest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (34%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

41

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Constructioncard Mock Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

constructioncardmocktest.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

constructioncardmocktest.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

constructioncardmocktest.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructioncardmocktest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Constructioncardmocktest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Constructioncard Mock Test. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: