Tools & Wizards About Us
constructionscope.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

constructionscope.com

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

319 ms

constructionscope.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to constructionscope.com homepage info - get ready to check Constructionscope best content right away, or after learning these important things about constructionscope.com

Get in touch with local construction companies in your area and view maps, reviews and contact details.

Visit constructionscope.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Constructionscope.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

constructionscope.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,870 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

constructionscope.com

143 ms

www.constructionmaps.net

194 ms

bootstrap.min.css

37 ms

chosen.min.css

52 ms

prism.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Constructionscope.com, 26% (19 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 22% (16 requests) were made to Conmaps.apollofindltdcok.netdna-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (284 ms) relates to the external source Constructionmaps.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 729.9 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

543.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Constructionscope.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 788.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

  • Original 65.7 kB
  • After minification 65.7 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 244.7 kB
  • After minification 236.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Constructionscope images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 529.8 kB

  • Original 788.1 kB
  • After minification 787.5 kB
  • After compression 258.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 529.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 143.6 kB

  • Original 175.0 kB
  • After minification 174.4 kB
  • After compression 31.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructionscope.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (67%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Constructionscope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

constructionscope.com

constructionscope.com

143 ms

www.constructionmaps.net

www.constructionmaps.net

194 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

37 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

52 ms

prism.css

prism.css

54 ms

desktop221.css

desktop221.css

60 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

80 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

51 ms

notifycustom.min.js

notifycustom.min.js

62 ms

masked.min.js

masked.min.js

58 ms

chosen.jquery.min.js

chosen.jquery.min.js

57 ms

chosen.proto.min.js

chosen.proto.min.js

54 ms

point-of-interest1.js

point-of-interest1.js

55 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

127 ms

thislogo.jpg

thislogo.jpg

112 ms

Logo_51x19_Dark.png

Logo_51x19_Dark.png

103 ms

1.js

1.js

72 ms

js

js

71 ms

chosen-sprite.png

chosen-sprite.png

42 ms

main2.jpg

main2.jpg

39 ms

as-seen-on1.png

as-seen-on1.png

11 ms

reg.png

reg.png

35 ms

unchecked.png

unchecked.png

36 ms

2.gif

2.gif

36 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

36 ms

collect

collect

21 ms

host.js

host.js

19 ms

collect

collect

69 ms

tm-float-bg-right-bottom.png

tm-float-bg-right-bottom.png

18 ms

float2-right.png

float2-right.png

20 ms

js

js

42 ms

in.php

in.php

240 ms

common.js

common.js

33 ms

map.js

map.js

34 ms

util.js

util.js

161 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

34 ms

streetview.js

streetview.js

155 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

24 ms

geocoder.js

geocoder.js

137 ms

infobox.js

infobox.js

134 ms

collapseIcon.png

collapseIcon.png

123 ms

onion.js

onion.js

48 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

127 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

101 ms

stats.js

stats.js

98 ms

controls.js

controls.js

87 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

48 ms

GeocodeService.Search

GeocodeService.Search

45 ms

GeoPhotoService.SingleImageSearch

GeoPhotoService.SingleImageSearch

269 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

127 ms

css

css

148 ms

jsonproxy.php

jsonproxy.php

284 ms

marker.js

marker.js

74 ms

GeoPhotoService.SingleImageSearch

GeoPhotoService.SingleImageSearch

163 ms

checked.png

checked.png

62 ms

contractors.png

contractors.png

51 ms

roofing.png

roofing.png

52 ms

plumber.png

plumber.png

68 ms

electrician.png

electrician.png

69 ms

google4.png

google4.png

70 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

71 ms

sv5.png

sv5.png

73 ms

vt

vt

94 ms

vt

vt

63 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

54 ms

cb_scout5.png

cb_scout5.png

56 ms

tmapctrl4.png

tmapctrl4.png

53 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

98 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

33 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

57 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

98 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

98 ms

pin.png

pin.png

6 ms

Accessibility Review

constructionscope.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

constructionscope.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

constructionscope.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Constructionscope.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Constructionscope.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

constructionscope.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Constructionscope. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: