7.6 sec in total
2 sec
5.4 sec
210 ms
Visit contentnext.com now to see the best up-to-date Contentnext content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contentnext.com
GigaOm provides research from engineering-led practitioners to help you innovate, upskill, and be ready for what’s next.
Visit contentnext.comWe analyzed Contentnext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Contentnext.com rating and web reputation
contentnext.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value1,400 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
2010 ms
144 ms
165 ms
130 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Contentnext.com, 43% (24 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 30% (17 requests) were made to Fldeputysheriffs.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 349.2 kB (63%)
555.5 kB
206.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Contentnext.com main page is 555.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 244.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 985 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contentnext images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 134.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contentnext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (66%)
38
13
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contentnext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
contentnext.com
2010 ms
reset.css
144 ms
inputs.js
165 ms
ie-hover-pack.js
130 ms
superfish.css
144 ms
jquery.min.js
72 ms
hoverIntent.js
228 ms
superfish.js
236 ms
jquery.innerfade.js
246 ms
6-Kjp0yxWs0
88 ms
likebox.php
2135 ms
fdsa-signup-button.jpg
150 ms
SprintLogo.jpg
55 ms
acredited.jpg
44 ms
logoCenturyLink.gif
94 ms
photo2.jpg
111 ms
middlephoto2.jpg
108 ms
deputy-sheriff-office1.jpg
93 ms
photo3.jpg
102 ms
officer-woman2.jpg
142 ms
courtroom-officer.jpg
224 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
59 ms
www-embed-player.js
80 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
23 ms
410ucuAGgaJ.css
160 ms
pERLJfhzcxv.css
198 ms
Czh0gDTFcBt.css
237 ms
Ek6lpayKeeB.css
323 ms
EoarYgA68t4.css
307 ms
EwTNI73NB7t.css
274 ms
FAHeNGXgPup.js
344 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
373 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
277 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
340 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
341 ms
1QuX41zDRrx.js
387 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
390 ms
m-2AbGY1fWh.js
456 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
396 ms
11392794_920683994656454_3328559047882492972_n.jpg
306 ms
safe_image.php
430 ms
11038999_911541322237388_695349564304329129_n.jpg
286 ms
12791008_1071379926253526_6635237392461568779_n.jpg
297 ms
12733459_1060224887369030_5195920903566592737_n.jpg
294 ms
12729040_1060224944035691_2231954960322693621_n.jpg
323 ms
1896854_999431796781673_2008404011234728066_n.jpg
298 ms
12066061_992836370774549_4075980647546200769_n.jpg
394 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
57 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
169 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
61 ms
sSwLTfB7PfP.png
61 ms
KC21oIUX00F.png
57 ms
TAw3VSvSUUG.png
58 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
182 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
38 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
78 ms
contentnext.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
contentnext.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
contentnext.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentnext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Contentnext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
contentnext.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Contentnext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: