Tools & Wizards About Us
contentwriting.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

contentwriting.us

Professional Content Writing Services | ContentWriting.Us

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

167 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

740 ms

contentwriting.us screenshot

About Website

Visit contentwriting.us now to see the best up-to-date Content Writing content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about contentwriting.us

Hire content writing services experts for flawless content writing! We are #1 agency empowered by professional USA writers proficient in quality deliveries.

Visit contentwriting.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Contentwriting.us page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contentwriting.us performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.117

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

contentwriting.us

167 ms

contentwriting.us

218 ms

www.contentwriting.us

306 ms

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

bootstrap.min.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Contentwriting.us, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) relates to the external source I.ytimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.7 kB (43%)

Content Size

138.6 kB

After Optimization

78.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Contentwriting.us main page is 138.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 68.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 68.7 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 342 B

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 19.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Writing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 49.8 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 43.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (34%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Writing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

contentwriting.us

contentwriting.us

167 ms

contentwriting.us

contentwriting.us

218 ms

www.contentwriting.us

www.contentwriting.us

306 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

25 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

63 ms

css2

css2

68 ms

css2

css2

85 ms

js

js

84 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

38 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

296 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

285 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

246 ms

numscroller.js

numscroller.js

237 ms

script.js

script.js

240 ms

jquery.datetimepicker.full.js

jquery.datetimepicker.full.js

131 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

138 ms

hotjar-2509111.js

hotjar-2509111.js

127 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

330 ms

playbutton.png

playbutton.png

78 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

24 ms

banner.webp

banner.webp

41 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

112 ms

prices-img.webp

prices-img.webp

122 ms

Article-Writing.webp

Article-Writing.webp

134 ms

Blog-Writing.webp

Blog-Writing.webp

136 ms

Case-Study.webp

Case-Study.webp

172 ms

Copywriting.webp

Copywriting.webp

175 ms

Ebook-Writing.webp

Ebook-Writing.webp

172 ms

Ecoomerce-Content.webp

Ecoomerce-Content.webp

175 ms

Email-Writing.webp

Email-Writing.webp

177 ms

Ghost-Writing.webp

Ghost-Writing.webp

176 ms

Newsletter-Writing.webp

Newsletter-Writing.webp

178 ms

Press-Release.webp

Press-Release.webp

176 ms

Product-Description.webp

Product-Description.webp

178 ms

Resume-Writing.webp

Resume-Writing.webp

180 ms

Review-Writing.webp

Review-Writing.webp

179 ms

Script-Writing.webp

Script-Writing.webp

179 ms

SEO-Content.webp

SEO-Content.webp

180 ms

Social-Media.webp

Social-Media.webp

198 ms

technical-writing.webp

technical-writing.webp

183 ms

Website-Content.webp

Website-Content.webp

197 ms

White-Paper-Writing.webp

White-Paper-Writing.webp

199 ms

angle-down-img.png

angle-down-img.png

199 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

27 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

38 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

47 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

53 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

60 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

60 ms

searcht.au

searcht.au

306 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

47 ms

default

default

91 ms

cookies.png

cookies.png

13 ms

Accessibility Review

contentwriting.us accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

contentwriting.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

contentwriting.us SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contentwriting.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Contentwriting.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contentwriting.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Writing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: