Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

11.3 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

10.7 sec

Page Rendered

412 ms

costamartravel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to costamartravel.com homepage info - get ready to check Costamar Travel best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about costamartravel.com

Agencia de Viajes. Paquetes turísticos con la mejor tarifa, pasajes aéreos, hoteles y cruceros con el mejor precio y asesoría.

Visit costamartravel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Costamartravel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

costamartravel.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

us.costamar.com

205 ms

1916 ms

A.language-selector.css,qv=3.1.5.pagespeed.cf.wsV_zHQC9x.css

156 ms

A.font-awesome.css.pagespeed.cf.rqZ4x09gbY.css

166 ms

modernizr-latest.js.pagespeed.jm.jGkDgcABGh.js

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 154 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Costamartravel.com, 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) relates to the external source Costamar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (17%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Costamartravel.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 202.0 kB

  • Original 229.3 kB
  • After minification 174.0 kB
  • After compression 27.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 55.3 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 202.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 811 B

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Costamar Travel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 498.1 kB

  • Original 721.8 kB
  • After minification 719.8 kB
  • After compression 223.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 498.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 342.6 kB

  • Original 416.3 kB
  • After minification 414.5 kB
  • After compression 73.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costamartravel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 342.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (38%)

Requests Now

148

After Optimization

92

The browser has sent 148 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Costamar Travel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

costamartravel.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

costamartravel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

costamartravel.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costamartravel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Costamartravel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Costamar Travel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: