6.6 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.3 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Cost Engineering content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about costengineering.nl
Cost Engineering Consultancy is an independent and professional service provider specializing in cost estimating, project controls and risk management.
Visit costengineering.nlWe analyzed Costengineering.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
costengineering.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value11,690 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
1182 ms
195 ms
173 ms
168 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Costengineering.nl, 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Costengineering.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 488.7 kB (13%)
3.7 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Costengineering.nl main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cost Engineering images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 174.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costengineering.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (41%)
123
72
The browser has sent 123 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cost Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.costengineering.eu
1182 ms
9f12ec7e619787a9f089bcf9cb813a64.css
195 ms
bootstrap.min.css
173 ms
pagebuilder.css
168 ms
jsn-gui-frontend.css
163 ms
front_end.css
166 ms
front_end_responsive.css
229 ms
articlelist.css
242 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
242 ms
button.css
243 ms
carousel.css
246 ms
carousel-responsive.css
271 ms
list.css
308 ms
module.css
318 ms
promobox.css
321 ms
finder.css
321 ms
jquery.min.js
409 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
349 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
386 ms
caption.js
396 ms
joomlashine.noconflict.js
399 ms
bootstrap.min.js
401 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
428 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
467 ms
button.js
475 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
479 ms
image.js
481 ms
promobox.js
487 ms
bootstrap.min.js
509 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
scrollReveal.js
548 ms
in.js
7 ms
main.js
553 ms
jsn-bootstrap.css
407 ms
jsn-fonticomoon.css
410 ms
icomoon.css
414 ms
font-awesome.min.css
437 ms
system.css
446 ms
cost-estimating-icon.png
426 ms
logo-cost-engineering.png
117 ms
train-821500-small.jpg
408 ms
off-shore-slider-image.jpg
596 ms
closing-jacket-slider-image.jpg
497 ms
mining-slider-image.jpg
484 ms
maintenance-mirrored-slider-image.jpg
516 ms
cleopatra-enterprise-slider-image.jpg
520 ms
Aker-Solutions.png
489 ms
Boskalis.png
564 ms
Neste-Oil.png
569 ms
Essar-Oil.png
577 ms
Jacobs.png
597 ms
Bayer.png
601 ms
Vopak.png
644 ms
BP.png
648 ms
Total.png
658 ms
OMV.png
676 ms
Heineken.png
677 ms
Samsung.png
681 ms
AECOM.png
724 ms
Bluewater.png
728 ms
PDVSA.png
738 ms
Sherritt.png
755 ms
Ceona.png
757 ms
Wacker.png
761 ms
COWI.png
803 ms
Honeywell.png
807 ms
Siemens.png
817 ms
Heerema.png
836 ms
ITER.png
837 ms
Shell.png
841 ms
CBI.png
883 ms
Pacific-Rubiales-Energy.png
887 ms
Qatar-Petroleum-International.png
897 ms
Sasol.png
915 ms
project-controls-icon.png
1045 ms
cost-management-icon.png
1109 ms
cleopatra-enterprise-icon.png
1108 ms
cesk-knowledgebase-icon.png
2113 ms
cost-engineering-academy-alt-icon.png
2111 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
104 ms
Evonik.png
906 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
25 ms
cost-management-be-in-total-control.jpg
461 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
who.js
279 ms
aileron-regular-webfont.woff
809 ms
linkid.js
8 ms
collect
27 ms
collect
56 ms
ga-audiences
39 ms
who.ashx
94 ms
firasans-semibold-webfont.woff
561 ms
cost-estimating-icon.png
549 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
573 ms
aileron-bold-webfont.woff
512 ms
cost-management-be-in-total-control.jpg
662 ms
Statoil.png
520 ms
NNE-Pharmaplan.png
485 ms
industry-illustration.png
481 ms
project-initiation-to-execution-icon.png
509 ms
estimate-validation-icon.png
510 ms
risk-analysis-icon.png
531 ms
forecasting-icon.png
530 ms
change-management-icon.png
498 ms
dedicated-tools-icon.png
514 ms
overlooking-plant.jpg
594 ms
tendering-icon.png
533 ms
contract-strategy-icon.png
533 ms
stay-within-budget-icon.png
540 ms
cleopatra-enterprise-on-laptop-small.png
525 ms
cost-estimating-icon.png
523 ms
project-controls-icon.png
551 ms
project-analytics-icon.png
534 ms
cost-model-cleopatra-enterprise-small.png
545 ms
industry-standard-knowledgebase-icon.png
570 ms
up-to-date-icon.png
526 ms
third-party-icon.png
525 ms
teacher.jpg
551 ms
certified-icon.png
535 ms
aace-aep-icon.png
547 ms
location-icon.png
568 ms
CE01.png
535 ms
title-image-silos-night.jpg
777 ms
mining-title-image.jpg
634 ms
title-image-silos-day.jpg
621 ms
visualization-title-image.jpg
552 ms
title-image-open-pit-mining.jpg
622 ms
cost-engineering-academy-title-image.jpg
539 ms
off-shore-title-image.jpg
711 ms
cost-engineering-footer-logo.png
554 ms
icon-footer-external-page.png
581 ms
project-controls-icon.png
574 ms
icon-footer-our-location.png
607 ms
icon-footer-contact-us.png
587 ms
cleopatra-enterprise-icon.png
585 ms
cost-management-icon.png
588 ms
cost-engineering-academy-alt-icon.png
82 ms
cesk-knowledgebase-icon.png
82 ms
costengineering.nl accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
costengineering.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
costengineering.nl SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costengineering.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Costengineering.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
costengineering.nl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cost Engineering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: