Tools & Wizards About Us
cotid.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

cotid.org

Coolest of the Internet Directory | cotid.org

Page Load Speed

522 ms in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

308 ms

Page Rendered

91 ms

cotid.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cotid.org homepage info - get ready to check Cotid best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about cotid.org

Coolest of the Internet Directory | cotid.org to the Coolest of the Internet Directory

Visit cotid.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cotid.org page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 399 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cotid.org performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cotid.org

123 ms

StyleSheet.css

57 ms

page.js

28 ms

cotid_logo.png

64 ms

search.png

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Cotid.org, 25% (6 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (123 ms) belongs to the original domain Cotid.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.3 kB (25%)

Content Size

155.2 kB

After Optimization

115.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cotid.org main page is 155.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 25.1 kB

  • Original 34.1 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cotid needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 104 B

  • Original 86.7 kB
  • After minification 86.7 kB
  • After compression 86.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 248 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cotid.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 248 B or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (43%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cotid. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cotid.org

cotid.org

123 ms

StyleSheet.css

StyleSheet.css

57 ms

page.js

page.js

28 ms

cotid_logo.png

cotid_logo.png

64 ms

search.png

search.png

70 ms

page.js

page.js

37 ms

header_bg.png

header_bg.png

55 ms

right_top.png

right_top.png

55 ms

search_bg.png

search_bg.png

43 ms

input_field.png

input_field.png

68 ms

top_left_bg.png

top_left_bg.png

56 ms

line_btn_top.png

line_btn_top.png

68 ms

text_bg.png

text_bg.png

68 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

39 ms

eso.BRQnzO8v.js

eso.BRQnzO8v.js

37 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7 ms

cpr_header_bg.png

cpr_header_bg.png

87 ms

cpr_sub_header_bg.png

cpr_sub_header_bg.png

96 ms

cpr_dsc_bg.png

cpr_dsc_bg.png

91 ms

gradient_menu_bottom.png

gradient_menu_bottom.png

84 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

eso.BRQnzO8v.js

eso.BRQnzO8v.js

17 ms

icons.38.svg.js

icons.38.svg.js

22 ms

js

js

61 ms

Accessibility Review

cotid.org accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

cotid.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

cotid.org SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cotid.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cotid.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cotid.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cotid. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: