3 sec in total
140 ms
2.5 sec
341 ms
Welcome to coxagainstspam.cox.net homepage info - get ready to check Coxagainst Spam Cox best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about coxagainstspam.cox.net
Learn more information on spam and anti-spam resources.
Visit coxagainstspam.cox.netWe analyzed Coxagainstspam.cox.net page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
coxagainstspam.cox.net performance score
140 ms
1406 ms
111 ms
82 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Coxagainstspam.cox.net, 41% (27 requests) were made to Cox.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Tags.tiqcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Cox.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (74%)
2.1 MB
536.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Coxagainstspam.cox.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.3 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Coxagainst Spam Cox needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 304.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coxagainstspam.cox.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 304.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (59%)
63
26
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coxagainst Spam Cox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coxagainstspam.cox.net
140 ms
article.cox
1406 ms
presentation.css.jgz
111 ms
OmnitureLibrary.js.jgz
82 ms
lib.js.jgz
133 ms
mojo.js.jgz
56 ms
stdlib.js.jgz
56 ms
cox.js.jgz
98 ms
all.css.jgz
101 ms
residential.css.jgz
87 ms
logoff.css
88 ms
mtagconfig.js
207 ms
presentation.js.jgz
37 ms
cox-config.js
65 ms
menu.png
168 ms
contact-us-mobile-icon.png
159 ms
Y294LWN1cnJlbnQtc2l0ZT1ub3J0aGVybnZpcmdpbmlh
144 ms
Y294LWN1cnJlbnQtc2l0ZT1ub3J0aGVybnZpcmdpbmlh
151 ms
Y294LWN1cnJlbnQtc2l0ZT1ub3J0aGVybnZpcmdpbmlh
151 ms
shop-mobile-menu-icon.png
110 ms
supportt-mobile-menu-icon.png
112 ms
my-connectiont-mobile-menu-icon.png
112 ms
my-account-mobile-menu-icon.png
112 ms
hdr-internet-lg.png
110 ms
form-fields.png
114 ms
bg-button-combined.png
108 ms
icon-back.gif
109 ms
icon-print.gif
110 ms
bg-rating.gif
117 ms
hdr-internet.png
113 ms
icon-info.gif
114 ms
icon-livechat.png
114 ms
icon-contacts.png
115 ms
icon-servicecenter.png
116 ms
icon-phonesupport.png
115 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
120 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
120 ms
utag.js
62 ms
headerprofile
354 ms
rd
43 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
100 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
99 ms
open-sans.semibold-webfont.woff
53 ms
open-sans.semibold-webfont.woff
38 ms
utag.46.js
13 ms
utag.132.js
12 ms
utag.242.js
12 ms
utag.58.js
58 ms
utag.124.js
13 ms
utag.163.js
57 ms
utag.179.js
56 ms
id
10 ms
fbds.js
90 ms
fbevents.js
127 ms
channel.js
425 ms
s43383204790297
21 ms
event
27 ms
6899.js
18 ms
oo_style.css
238 ms
conversion_async.js
14 ms
49 ms
s
56 ms
u
51 ms
29 ms
103 ms
9 ms
coxagainstspam.cox.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coxagainstspam.cox.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Coxagainstspam.cox.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coxagainstspam.cox.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coxagainst Spam Cox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: