1.3 sec in total
199 ms
999 ms
131 ms
Click here to check amazing Critical Warning 6 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about criticalwarning6.com
Michael Lombardi's big five predictions have all came true. He feels so strongly about his sixth prediction that he decided to present it Critical Warning Number Six in a new video presentation.
Visit criticalwarning6.comWe analyzed Criticalwarning6.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
criticalwarning6.com performance score
199 ms
16 ms
98 ms
13 ms
125 ms
Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Criticalwarning6.com, 29% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 29% (5 requests) were made to Lombardifinancial.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (520 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 145.8 kB (52%)
279.0 kB
133.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Criticalwarning6.com main page is 279.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 253.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 987 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 987 B or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Critical Warning 6 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.8 kB or 57% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (27%)
15
11
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Critical Warning 6. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
criticalwarning6.com
199 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
index_03052014.php
98 ms
collect
13 ms
jwplayer.js
125 ms
exitsplash.php
44 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
obama.jpg
63 ms
arrows.gif
44 ms
collect
10 ms
collect
62 ms
34 ms
gtm.js
46 ms
520 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
4 ms
roundtrip.js
10 ms
criticalwarning6.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
criticalwarning6.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
criticalwarning6.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Criticalwarning6.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Criticalwarning6.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
criticalwarning6.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Critical Warning 6. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: