4.2 sec in total
Visit cssforest.org now to see the best up-to-date CSS Forest content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cssforest.org
We analyzed Cssforest.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cssforest.org performance score
Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Cssforest.org, 33% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 17% (1 request) were made to Gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cssforest.org.
Page size can be reduced by 5.1 kB (17%)
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 555 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CSS Forest needs image optimization as it can save up to 555 B or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 57 B
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cssforest.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
cssforest.org accessibility score
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
[accesskey] values are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cssforest.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Browser errors were logged to the console
cssforest.org SEO score
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cssforest.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cssforest.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CSS Forest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: