Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

cuddeback.com

Cuddeback - Cuddeback

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

770 ms

Page Rendered

402 ms

cuddeback.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cuddeback.com homepage info - get ready to check Cuddeback best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cuddeback.com

Visit cuddeback.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cuddeback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cuddeback.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

cuddeback.com

89 ms

bootstrap.min.css

141 ms

style.css

114 ms

css

24 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Cuddeback.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) belongs to the original domain Cuddeback.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 793.7 kB (23%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Cuddeback.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

  • Original 71.9 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cuddeback images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 419.8 kB

  • Original 660.5 kB
  • After minification 660.1 kB
  • After compression 240.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 299.9 kB

  • Original 362.7 kB
  • After minification 359.6 kB
  • After compression 62.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cuddeback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 299.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (40%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cuddeback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

cuddeback.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cuddeback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cuddeback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cuddeback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: