1.3 sec in total
89 ms
770 ms
402 ms
Welcome to cuddeback.com homepage info - get ready to check Cuddeback best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cuddeback.com
Visit cuddeback.comWe analyzed Cuddeback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
cuddeback.com performance score
89 ms
141 ms
114 ms
24 ms
3 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Cuddeback.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) belongs to the original domain Cuddeback.com.
Page size can be reduced by 793.7 kB (23%)
3.4 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Cuddeback.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cuddeback images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 419.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 299.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cuddeback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 299.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (40%)
48
29
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cuddeback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cuddeback.com
89 ms
bootstrap.min.css
141 ms
style.css
114 ms
css
24 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
3 ms
jquery.html5support.min.js
77 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.css
20 ms
bootstrap-image-gallery.css
59 ms
cdb-bootstrap-addons.css
75 ms
addthis_widget.js
9 ms
bootstrap.min.js
119 ms
jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js
13 ms
bootstrap-image-gallery.min.js
90 ms
ga.js
125 ms
UuPC4Au0fl0
184 ms
blue-seal-120-70-non-typical-inc-23003614.png
130 ms
logo.png
118 ms
email.png
87 ms
fb.png
90 ms
you.png
89 ms
twit.png
90 ms
inst.png
89 ms
cart.jpg
111 ms
trigger-new.jpg
256 ms
best.jpg
256 ms
multi.jpg
255 ms
performance.jpg
257 ms
multi.png
253 ms
black.png
169 ms
ir.png
254 ms
color.png
256 ms
accessories.png
259 ms
trophy.png
257 ms
announce.jpg
257 ms
113923_0.JPG
434 ms
review-camera.png
280 ms
stars.png
281 ms
warranty.png
280 ms
-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff
47 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
68 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
287 ms
boost
60 ms
300lo.json
57 ms
counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js
26 ms
sh.07f0d9bf220d07a763adad1e.html
40 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
shares.json
25 ms
www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css
26 ms
www-embed-player.js
45 ms
base.js
80 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
56 ms
ad_status.js
95 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
48 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
cuddeback.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cuddeback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cuddeback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cuddeback.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cuddeback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: