2.4 sec in total
775 ms
1.4 sec
240 ms
Welcome to currentweek.net homepage info - get ready to check Currentweek best content right away, or after learning these important things about currentweek.net
Visit currentweek.netWe analyzed Currentweek.net page load time and found that the first response time was 775 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
currentweek.net performance score
775 ms
41 ms
73 ms
71 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Currentweek.net, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (775 ms) belongs to the original domain Currentweek.net.
Page size can be reduced by 408.9 kB (65%)
630.6 kB
221.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Currentweek.net main page is 630.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 418.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Currentweek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 287.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Currentweek.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (79%)
42
9
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Currentweek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
currentweek.net
775 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
41 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
73 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
71 ms
calendar-jos.css
74 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
75 ms
style.css
86 ms
nav.css
76 ms
1140.css
107 ms
ie.css
108 ms
css
42 ms
jquery.js
172 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
110 ms
js
48 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
114 ms
jelly.min.js
164 ms
file-upload.js
143 ms
calendar.js
206 ms
calendar_function.js
145 ms
main_div_front_end.js
209 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
208 ms
jquery.elemental.components.js
211 ms
responsiveNavigation.js
213 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
212 ms
masonry.min.js
215 ms
main.js
219 ms
widget.min.js
252 ms
core.min.js
252 ms
mouse.min.js
257 ms
slider.min.js
257 ms
button.min.js
257 ms
spinner.min.js
262 ms
effect.min.js
264 ms
effect-shake.min.js
264 ms
wp-embed.min.js
300 ms
fleuron.png
181 ms
post-types.png
190 ms
FileMaker_Custom_App_Developer_1200x630-1503428670364-180x120.jpg
187 ms
1-v3atMQyzmq0ttQoNNY6bsA-180x120.png
186 ms
php-img-180x120.png
183 ms
579152036-180x120.jpg
182 ms
banner1-180x120.jpg
223 ms
nAKwuw6_dIh5kwvpj3ShNfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
23 ms
lJHK3MdZ4tadQZQahj7hrxTbgVql8nDJpwnrE27mub0.woff
33 ms
O2mMrdLgt2qhfmg0F7EJcRTbgVql8nDJpwnrE27mub0.woff
40 ms
VT0F-oM1OMR9P9mQqo4fbBTbgVql8nDJpwnrE27mub0.woff
43 ms
3w-uydIBEkCwSHsOii6OVRTbgVql8nDJpwnrE27mub0.woff
65 ms
print.css
39 ms
currentweek.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Currentweek.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Currentweek.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
currentweek.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Currentweek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: