4.1 sec in total
845 ms
3.1 sec
153 ms
Welcome to cut.ma homepage info - get ready to check Cut best content for Morocco right away, or after learning these important things about cut.ma
Create short urls from your longer website urls. No registration required. Completely free to use.
Visit cut.maWe analyzed Cut.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 845 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
cut.ma performance score
845 ms
270 ms
278 ms
279 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Cut.ma, 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Cut.ma.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (71%)
1.5 MB
424.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Cut.ma main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 904.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cut needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 675.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 675.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 302.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cut.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 302.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (57%)
60
26
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cut. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cut.ma
845 ms
bootstrap.css
270 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
278 ms
wide_layout.css
279 ms
docs.css
279 ms
options.css
289 ms
builder.css
291 ms
screen.css
408 ms
fonts.css
418 ms
font-awesome.min.css
412 ms
green.css
415 ms
styles.css
721 ms
jquery.min.js
1181 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js
829 ms
jquery.tweet.js
415 ms
bootstrap.min.js
560 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
429 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
540 ms
testimonialrotator.js
564 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
662 ms
custom.js
697 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1093 ms
jquery.autosize-min.js
742 ms
ZeroClipboard.min.js
914 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
836 ms
responsive.css
964 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
1676 ms
3ghdes.js
1041 ms
style2.css
1039 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
error.html
234 ms
design_29.png
145 ms
cmaag_07.png
160 ms
us.png
145 ms
maroc.png
160 ms
resp.png
142 ms
cmaag_04.png
144 ms
cmaag_02.png
261 ms
cmaag_13.png
266 ms
star_icon.png
268 ms
plus_icon.png
276 ms
twitter_icon.png
304 ms
cmaag_21.png
287 ms
cmaag_24.png
381 ms
cmaag_33.png
382 ms
cmaag_36.png
394 ms
cmaag_38.png
404 ms
BfQP1MR3mJNaumtWa4Tizg.ttf
36 ms
zR-6QGMCFX5j-6nbH_HpIQ.ttf
37 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
36 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
47 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
64 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
61 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
63 ms
ca-pub-6024349426378143.js
52 ms
zrt_lookup.html
42 ms
show_ads_impl.js
56 ms
design_29-43.png
536 ms
ads
254 ms
osd.js
5 ms
6029304995352264446
35 ms
abg.js
38 ms
m_js_controller.js
55 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
53 ms
s
17 ms
x_button_blue2.png
17 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
2 ms
cut.ma SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cut.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cut.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cut.ma
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cut. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: