8.6 sec in total
2.2 sec
5.3 sec
1.1 sec
Visit cutoffmarks.in now to see the best up-to-date Cut Off Marks content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cutoffmarks.in
UP boarD 10Th/12tH datE sheeT 2016 High|Intermediate School exam time table 2016 of upmsp board
Visit cutoffmarks.inWe analyzed Cutoffmarks.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
cutoffmarks.in performance score
2162 ms
463 ms
706 ms
474 ms
1448 ms
Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Cutoffmarks.in, 25% (35 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (18 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cutoffmarks.in.
Page size can be reduced by 597.5 kB (59%)
1.0 MB
407.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Cutoffmarks.in main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 517.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 245.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 245.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cut Off Marks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 288.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 288.2 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cutoffmarks.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (57%)
135
58
The browser has sent 135 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cut Off Marks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cutoffmarks.in
2162 ms
fab_style.css
463 ms
scs.css
706 ms
style.css
474 ms
style.css
1448 ms
jquery.js
1707 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1161 ms
scs.js
1491 ms
launch.js
1186 ms
small-menu.js
1262 ms
adsbygoogle.js
15 ms
counters.js
191 ms
infolinks_main.js
56 ms
share-small.png
175 ms
UP-Board.jpg
1176 ms
panchati-raj.jpg
1175 ms
RGPV.jpg
1176 ms
ca-pub-4430959020291264.js
50 ms
zrt_lookup.html
45 ms
show_ads_impl.js
64 ms
widgets.js
195 ms
sdk.js
31 ms
plusone.js
163 ms
in.js
18 ms
PinExt.png
193 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
138 ms
osd.js
36 ms
ads
64 ms
619 ms
ads
320 ms
xd_arbiter.php
22 ms
xd_arbiter.php
1136 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
291 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
377 ms
fastbutton
518 ms
fastbutton
529 ms
fastbutton
799 ms
fastbutton
569 ms
fastbutton
692 ms
fastbutton
567 ms
fastbutton
746 ms
fastbutton
780 ms
fastbutton
878 ms
fastbutton
879 ms
share
747 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
946 ms
share
819 ms
share
815 ms
share
827 ms
share
814 ms
share
796 ms
share
777 ms
share
775 ms
share
799 ms
share
770 ms
postmessageRelay
310 ms
js15.js
27 ms
rs=AGLTcCPp65oTnX7XI_ISus95mcUHkH7hXw
183 ms
0.php
20 ms
user_sync.html
17 ms
usersyncup-an.html
230 ms
ice.js
442 ms
showad.js
205 ms
ads
295 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
465 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
373 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
242 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
236 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
230 ms
PugMaster
190 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
267 ms
pixel
117 ms
Pug
116 ms
usersync.aspx
119 ms
likebox.php
227 ms
Pug
34 ms
Pug
31 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
23 ms
Pug
28 ms
like.php
169 ms
Pug
21 ms
Pug
13 ms
like.php
163 ms
like.php
170 ms
like.php
186 ms
like.php
147 ms
like.php
227 ms
like.php
236 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
83 ms
Pug
16 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
126 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
156 ms
kE_Z8j4XNUS.css
213 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
237 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
264 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
227 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
227 ms
OloiM1PZafe.js
227 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
295 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
284 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
283 ms
pObvZSrFc_4.js
283 ms
Kt4tkgSRvHH.js
276 ms
H3EKDTObx05.js
294 ms
eR-qA8bp1RM.js
331 ms
like.php
203 ms
like.php
211 ms
like.php
251 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
348 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
228 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
323 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
313 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
308 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
312 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
308 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
303 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
296 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
261 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
244 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
327 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
324 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
287 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
286 ms
10421386_945898785455126_5974292561595964479_n.jpg
204 ms
156200_492882134090129_481415723_n.jpg
202 ms
1385014_1404386623130181_849844416_n.jpg
321 ms
12376776_710590099043804_3772671343281865372_n.jpg
370 ms
1497545_559229270857313_8254243791361744772_n.jpg
408 ms
12235065_1659456000968952_1757956426217146432_n.jpg
414 ms
10398545_193627457677847_2450858153147544302_n.jpg
350 ms
12573166_189758344714691_7290775883485915380_n.jpg
360 ms
1936522_192850564425309_3570812999024164334_n.jpg
403 ms
12803061_928269190624075_4460775625844273842_n.jpg
397 ms
10400126_1680725048850120_3435662157812689050_n.jpg
378 ms
11350606_826569754092038_3964738351069264992_n.jpg
388 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
196 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
196 ms
jot.html
100 ms
gxbPuQdXIZP.png
106 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
19 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
21 ms
cutoffmarks.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cutoffmarks.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cutoffmarks.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cutoffmarks.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cut Off Marks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: