2 sec in total
468 ms
1.4 sec
147 ms
Visit cyberhobo.net now to see the best up-to-date Cyberhobo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cyberhobo.net
Visit cyberhobo.netWe analyzed Cyberhobo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 468 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
cyberhobo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
468 ms
218 ms
220 ms
148 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Cyberhobo.net, 21% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (505 ms) belongs to the original domain Cyberhobo.net.
Page size can be reduced by 543.2 kB (69%)
787.7 kB
244.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Cyberhobo.net main page is 787.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 640.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cyberhobo needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 442.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 442.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cyberhobo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (84%)
37
6
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cyberhobo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cyberhobo.net
468 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
218 ms
jquery.ui.custom.css
220 ms
jquery.ns-contactdialog.css
148 ms
nyroModal.css
149 ms
style.css
224 ms
css
22 ms
modals.css
209 ms
jquery.js
444 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
222 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js
505 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
288 ms
jquery.ns-contactdialog.js
289 ms
www.cyberhobo.net
342 ms
jquery.nyroModal.custom.min.js
297 ms
gpx-viewer-content.js
359 ms
retina-cookie.js
363 ms
external-tracking.min.js
370 ms
subscribe-form.css
284 ms
decode-with-sidebar.js
300 ms
caldera-modals.js
304 ms
wp-embed.min.js
332 ms
subscribe-form.min.js
358 ms
search-form.js
423 ms
find-me.js
423 ms
ga.js
14 ms
cyber-hobo.png
156 ms
__utm.gif
108 ms
recaptcha_ajax.js
23 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
101 ms
ui-icons_222222_256x240.png
99 ms
challenge
47 ms
g6qlE9hbcrtCq0agucy03kPIdFYel5UicYHotHMXHKo.js
3 ms
refresh.png
25 ms
audio.png
3 ms
text.png
5 ms
help.png
6 ms
logo.png
6 ms
cyberhobo.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
cyberhobo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cyberhobo.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cyberhobo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cyberhobo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cyberhobo.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cyberhobo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: