Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

cyberselect.com

My Blog – Multi Purpose Site

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

3.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

cyberselect.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cyberselect.com now to see the best up-to-date Cyberselect content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cyberselect.com

Visit cyberselect.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cyberselect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Cyberselect.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

cyberselect.com performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cyberselect.com

3369 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Cyberselect.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Cyberselect.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

49.7 kB

After Optimization

31.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Cyberselect.com main page is 49.7 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 22.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 114 B

  • Original 385 B
  • After minification 384 B
  • After compression 271 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114 B or 30% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.9 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cyberselect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 18.5 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cyberselect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

cyberselect.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

cyberselect.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cyberselect.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cyberselect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cyberselect.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cyberselect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: