Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk

hearclear | Expert hearing health and hearing aid advice

Page Load Speed

16.4 sec in total

First Response

339 ms

Resources Loaded

15.2 sec

Page Rendered

813 ms

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Weightloss Cliniccompare content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk

Get weight loss surgery costs, finance options and repayment plans. Find out which type of surgery is right for you from our leading clinics

Visit weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 16 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,930 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.359

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk

339 ms

trustpilot.css

151 ms

css_e798c2b444cf7d609df1c648113c1f56_8.css

155 ms

css_8f9e27336907e8baecca95ef08206abf_8.css

157 ms

css_ef29f115cda16e134d812ee31040329d_8.css

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk, 23% (24 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.1 sec) relates to the external source Embed.wistia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 238.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

984.8 kB

After Optimization

746.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk main page is 984.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 429.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 59.7 kB

  • Original 80.3 kB
  • After minification 75.2 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 359.4 kB
  • After minification 358.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weightloss Cliniccompare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 81.6 kB

  • Original 429.7 kB
  • After minification 426.4 kB
  • After compression 348.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 95.4 kB

  • Original 115.4 kB
  • After minification 106.5 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (56%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weightloss Cliniccompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Weightloss.cliniccompare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weightloss Cliniccompare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: